Listen to Carolyn Yeager’s analysis of the internet blogger The Black Rabbit of Inlé, who we shall henceforth refer to as The Black Rabbi of Inlé, who runs the blog:
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com
Skip forward to the second half of the second hour of Carolyn’s April 16th show titled “Wolves Among the Sheep” for the relevant commentary. I strongly concur with her assessment of this dubious character.
At first glance, this blogger appears to be Jew-wise and a holocaust revisionist. But upon closer inspection we find that he has a fervent hard-on for bashing Hitler, Nazis and National Socialism. Why would someone who is Jew-aware and who has seen through the mindless fiction of the holocaust™ still have a negative opinion of Adolf Hitler? This doesn’t make sense.
Since The Black Rabbi of Inlé is masquerading as a person who is hip to Jewish crimes and propaganda, his strategy is to try to link Adolf Hitler with Jews and Zionism and to portray Hitler’s National Socialist regime as a stooge of Jewry. The intended target of The Black Rabbi of Inlé’s propaganda is nationalists. He wants nationalists to believe that Hitler and National Socialism were secretly controlled by Jews. This meme is intended to scare nationalists away from National Socialism as a legitimate counter-force against International Jewry, as it so successfully proved to be in Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. This meme is essentially intended to disarm and demoralize nationalists. In his ceaseless efforts to paint Hitler as a crypto-Jew, Zionist, Rothschild-descendant, amoung countless other absurdities, The Black Rabbi of Inlé is leading the reader to believe that all historical opposition to Jewry was controlled by Jewry in some form or another. In this context, The Black Rabbi of Inlé is suggesting that any resistance to International Jewry is basically obsolete, and that we should all just throw in the towel now and bow down to our Chosenite overlords.
As Carolyn Yeager noted, the Britishness of this blogger is a major red flag. Since when can a Brit be trusted concerning Adolf Hitler? Since when have Brits ever been impartial when it comes to WW2, Hitler and Nazi Germany? After all, it was Britain — operating as International Jewry’s most loyal servant and the Rothschilds’ national bitch since the 1700′s — who declared war on Germany in 1939 and commenced a ruthless campaign of demonic destruction, annihilating millions of German men, women and children, with firebombs from the sky. In order to justify the monstrosities committed by his sick nation during the war, The Black Rabbi of Inlé is seeking to demonize, denigrate and dehumanize Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist system. By doing so he is trying to justify the sinister actions taken by Britain to destroy Hitler and his nation by force of arms. Again, it must be noted that the intended target of his propaganda are nationalists, and so by saying Hitler was a Jewish agent he is implying that it is a good thing that Hitler was taken out of the picture, thereby subtly justifying Britain’s murderous actions against Germany and the war itself. This begs the question: if Hitler was really a Jewish agent, then why would the Jews who ran Britain want him to be taken out? Why eliminate one of your own “agents” who is working on your behalf? It is an utterly illogical premise.
It was the British official Arthur James Balfour — not Adolf Hitler — who drafted and signed the Balfour Declaration in 1917 pledging Zionist Jewry Palestine as their national homeland. It was via the assistance of Britain, the USA and the USSR, that the state of Israel was formed in 1948. It was a British statesman named Arthur Greenwood — not Adolf Hitler — who, in 1940, made a vocal pledge to assist the Jews in the establishment of a New Jew World Order after the Allies were victorious in vanquishing International Jewry’s greatest adversary and opponent, Adolf Hitler and National Socialism. (See “NEW WORLD ORDER PLEDGED TO JEWS.” The New York Times. October 6th 1940) It was the British prime minister Winston Churchill, the Soviet dictator Josef Stalin and the American president Theodore Roosevelt who all openly declared themselves to be Zionists — not Adolf Hitler. Instead of denouncing the consistently shameful and treacherous deeds of his philosemitic nation and kinsmen, The Black Rabbi of Inlé endeavors to shift the blame onto Hitler, he aims at making Hitler a scapegoat for the degenerate behavior of his evil Jewish-controlled nation — Britain. The Black Rabbi of Inlé wishes to exonerate his guilt-ridden British brethren for handing the Jews world domination on a silver platter following WW2. In doing so, The Black Rabbi of Inlé is engaging in psychological projection, an age-old Orwellian tactic of Jewry.
The Black Rabbi of Inlé seems to be a very confused individual. He never really makes it clear where he stands. Is he anti-Jewish or merely anti-Zionist? The latter appears to be the case. In his desperate campaign to uncover a drop of Jewish blood in Hitler’s veins, which he has failed to do, The Black Rabbi of Inlé shot himself in the foot. The Black Rabbi of Inlé only seems to become all-out anti-Jew when he is looking to slander and malign Hitler as an agent of Jews by digging up some vague and doubtful connection between Hitler, Jews, Zionism or Communism. When he is not talking about Hitler, The Black Rabbi of Inlé suddenly morphs into a mildly anti-Zionist (read: pro-Jew) type who astonishingly concurs with Abe Foxman of the ADL that The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion were faked by “anti-Semitic Russians.”
For argument’s sake, let’s presuppose Hitler was indeed lenient or in league with Jews or had some Jewish blood in him. Why would that bother The Black Rabbi of Inlé when he himself praises full-blooded Jewish supremacists like Norman Finkelstein? Never-mind being “in league with Jews,” Finkelstein IS a Jew, and an obnoxious one at that! In this post The Black Rabbi of Inlé describes Finkelstein as someone who is “much admired.” On this YouTube comment page, posting under the handle Lynchie3000, The Black Rabbi of Inlé admits that he is a “big fan” of the Jew supremacist, anti-revisionist, Norman Finkelstein. How can someone who admires and praises Jewish supremacists like Finkelstein be critical of Hitler for alleged connections to Jews or Zionism? That’s flagrantly hypocritical.
A brazenly moronic contradiction in The Black Rabbi of Inlé’s narrative on Hitler is his simultaneous characterization of Hitler and the Nazis as acting too harshly against the Jews and being too lenient, soft and/or in cahoots with the Jews! In the comments section of this YouTube video The Black Rabbi of Inlé, posting under the handle Lynchie3000, says:
“The Nazis were a brutal criminal regime, bent on ethnically cleansing Jews from Europe, those they didn’t ship to Russia, they imprisoned as slave labourers.”
If I didn’t know this came from him I could swear that it emerged from the mouth of Elie Wiesel, Deborah Lipstadt or Simon Wiesenthal! Denouncing the Nazis as “brutal and criminal” for bravely attempting to liberate Europe from the evils of Jewry can only be described as straight up philosemitism! What, is he saying that he wants to live alongside Jews in Europe? Must be! Again, this shows how disingenuous The Black Rabbi of Inlé really is. He has made dozens upon dozens of posts on his blog portraying Hitler as either a crypto-Jew, a Zionist, in league with Jews, working for Jewish bankers, and as a softie on the Jewish question. For example, look at this, this, this and this. Which is it, Hitler was too harsh in his treatment of Jews or too soft and lenient with them? It can’t be both! Which is it, Hitler was a staunch Jew hater bent on “ethnically cleansing Jews from Europe” or an ardent Jew lover in cahoots with Jewish bankers and the Zionist movement? When you finally make up your mind, let us know.
All of the confusing nonsense that this guy peddles out leads his readers to become distracted and unsure of anything. What is his main message, that Jews are the enemy or that Adolf Hitler is the enemy? His posts are devoid of any purpose or meaning, leaving his readers without direction in this fight against the eternal world enemy. As we are continually confused by the contradictory propaganda of The Black Rabbi of Inlé, Jewry is strengthened. Perhaps that is the real aim and purpose of The Black Rabbi of Inlé’s fallacious blog? It’s the only motive I can decipher based on the observations illustrated herein.
– ZCF
