Print 
PDF
BOYCOTT YOUTUBE (JEWTUBE)
*Prothink Network
Links
Recommended Reading
- Behind Communism by Frank L. Britton
- Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed
- Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler
- Racial Nationalist Library
- Solving 9/11 by Christopher Bollyn
- The Rulers of Russia by Denis Fahey
- Under the Sign of the Scorpion by Juri Lina
- VHO – Holocaust Revisionism
- Waters Flowing Eastward by Leslie Fry
The Metzger Interview added nothing to your website but rather detracted. NS Germany was torn between two possibilities, simultaniously impossible to implement, one a Republic based on the United States and Ancient Rome, the other the Pan-Germanic “Blood and Soil” policy of Arminius that enemy of Roman who halted its advance. Examine Rome and see its enivitable fall. Yet Deutschland remained. Why? Now look at the States. Yockey figured the US as the Enemy of Europe, because a competitor in producing a failed system. This was because of his adherence to the theories of Spengler. Spengler himself based them on Nietzsche, who I imagine in the future will be largely discredited as a man within time. Consider Christianity was taken on more quickly by the old Roman citzenry than by the new Rome of manumitted slaves, and for reasons I will leave you to consider.
Nowhere do I see the level of thinking necessary to solve the jewish questions in terms of equitible outcomes for all peoples. Until that spark takes hold we risk loosing even the feeble gains we have made in insight during this on going world crisis.
All the best.
Stay on target. The future is always happening, and situations are always fluid.
There is some talk of Metzger being Jewish, can’t say either way. However I have a bad gut instinct about the Metzgers. Also I thought Mike Delaney came across very poorly in the interview with those Canadians.
The pure inescapable logic of MSMD/ZCF articles is being occluded by emotionally charged ranting. I see this site that could teach so much to many being deliberately marginalised.
Pity.
“The pure inescapable logic of MSMD/ZCF articles is being occluded by emotionally charged ranting.”
Emotionally charged ranting? Could you be a little more specific about what the hell you are talking about?
p.s. Instead of being an armchair critic, why don’t you go make your own website and prove your worth?
I don’t perceive any “emotionally charged ranting.” These videos can be highly emotional for certain individuals and certainly highly controversial, but they are, after all, only videos of other people’s points of views and thus a kind of objective sampling of different perspectives. This kind of approach is so far from a charge of “emotionally charged ranting” that I agree with ZFF — what the hell is “rodin” talking about?
“There is some talk of Metzger being Jewish, can’t say either way. “
Just like “some talk” that Hitler was Jewish. Pure b.s.! Metzger is the surname of his stepfather which Tom adopted after his mother remarried. He is of Scottish background. TT once mentioned this in one of his radio programs (or on another show that interviewed him) and also mentioned his original surname (which I can’t recall at the moment).
Phil
Here’s a two-hour interview of Tom Metzger by Charles Giuliani on his Truth Hertz program:
http://mp3.oraclebroadcasting.com/Truth_Hertz/Truth_Hertz.2011-11-15_16k.mp3
Phil
Phil,
I found that Tom Metzger interview very informative — and cleaned up some fog in the brain a bit too. Thanks for the suggestion.
“The Metzger Interview added nothing to your website but rather detracted.”
Nonsense. I enjoy listening to Terrible Tommy, and more times than not, learn something new. I first learned about him in the late-1980s with his appearances on the Morton Downey Jr. show.
Phil
I agree. I just watched the interview. Kind of makes me glad Hitchens is dead.
“Examine Rome and see its enivitable fall. “
Multiculturalism and miscegenation contributed greatly to its fall.
Phil
I don’t perceive any “emotionally charged ranting” on this website at all. These videos can be highly emotional for certain individuals and certainly can be perceived as highly controversial, but they are, after all, only videos of other people’s points of views and thus a kind of objective sampling of different perspectives. This kind of approach is so far from a charge of “emotionally charged ranting” that I agree with ZFF — what the hell are you talking about?
I think the Hitchens interview is relevant and properly placed. Note the Canadian interview of Mike Delaney appearing below.
Both interviews cover many of the very same issues.
Unfortunately, we occasionally get commenter’s here who fancy themselves as some sort of gods gift to intellectuals. When in reality, they are spouting complete bs.
Stay away from the paint fumes there Anthony
Peter the “conservative Christian ” and Christopher the ” devout atheist “.
They discovered their own jewish roots only recently . Here’s some muddled thinking from Peter Hitchens :
” How Not to Change Your Mind – We Still Won’t Face the Ghastly Truth about Bombing Germany
It is a great pity, but it is probably true, that by the time the Churchill cult of ‘The ‘Finest Hour’ and ‘plucky little Britain’ has finally faded from the national mind, it will be too late. These illusions are one of the main reasons why we have sunk not merely from the first to the second, but from the second to the third rank of nations. My distinguished colleague Dan Atkinson, together with the Guardian’s perceptive Larry Elliott, has just published a book ‘Going South – Why Britain will have a Third World Economy by 2014’, illustrating the terrible national peril we are in.
I attack our horrible national blindness over the bombing of Germany because it is the key to this fantasy of Britain as a mighty, moral world power which saved the planet from evil in 1940. That fantasy has led us down many foolish paths, and continues to do so – our moves towards an unhinged intervention in Syria still echo the same deluded view that we can do good with bombs.
I know that by raising this question I will anger many of my readers. Why should I consciously do this? I like my readers. For the most part we share a deep concern for our nation, its merits and its morals. Partly it is because I can do no other. I know that what I say about this is the sober truth. Partly it is because my own unwilling recognition of the truth was one of the key steps along the road to serious thought.
Arguments for the Bombing 1. Germany was supremely evil
Let us examine some of the arguments ranged against me, in many cases by people who have read the headline but not the article, and are plainly not prepared to think rationally about the subject. One is ‘we were in confrontation with the most evil regime the world has ever known’ (Glenn Newlands). Indeed we were. But we were also , from the summer of 1941 (before the area bombing began) *in alliance* with the second most evil (opinions vary as to which was worse, but for the sake of argument I’ll concede that it was this way round) regime the world has ever known, the slavery and murder empire of Josef Stalin.
In that case, the fact that we were fighting *beside* one evil empire *against* another evil empire robs our war of any general moral purpose. This is particularly important when you remember that, by treaty and secret agreement, we then aided Josef Stalin in imposing his blood-dabbled rule upon Bulgaria, Romania, Poland,, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and eastern Germany. We also confirmed his annexation by invasion of eastern Poland and the Baltic states, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia (though we pretended, to salve our consciences to refuse recognition to the Baltic annexations). We also, in a shocking episode, handed back many people who had fought on our side in the war to Stalin, knowing perfectly well that he would murder or imprison them. We knew what we were doing.
The sad truth is that we were fighting – not very competently, in my view – for our national interests, not in a moral crusade. We had been perfectly happy to maintain good relations with Hitler’s Germany from the beginning of National Socialist rule in 1933 until the outbreak of war in 1939 (a period slightly longer than the war itself). We made major treaties with the Hitler government, notably the Anglo-German naval treaty. We continued these relations after it became clear that the Hitler government was intent on cruel and bloody persecution of German Jews (though the policy of extermination did not begin until after the war began and may, rather horrifyingly have been a by-product of the war). The fantasy that we went to war to save the Jews, or because we didn’t like Hitler’s dictatorship is just that, a fantasy. We never bombed the death camps or the railways leading to them, though we knew where they were, and we were reluctant to believe the truth about them after very brave men risked their all to get the information to us. We went to war with Germany because Germany invaded Poland, to which we had promised aid in the event of war. This, as discussed here before, was an act of amazing diplomatic incompetence and dishonesty. When it came to it, we did nothing to help Poland at all, except declare war on Germany without having the means to wage it…..”
continues:
http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2012/07/how-not-to-change-your-mind-we-still-wont-face-the-ghastly-truth-about-bombing-germany.html
I sent him this letter. Enjoy
—
Dear Mr. Hitchens,
Your brother was a person who sold his abilities, talent, and name for an inferior purpose – just as you have done with your recent scribbling. Evidently it runs in the family.
You have taken up the official position of coward and liar. You knowing bear false witness to the jewish lie of the holy hoax.
The grand jew-lie of the holy hoax consists of so many overlapping lies – and the lies are so impacted, nested and interwoven that a metaphorical archeology expedition would have to be undertaken to even begin to address the issue.
One would need to start removing and untangling layer upon layer of lies to get to a specific lie for refutation. The story is a hoax distilled from wartime propaganda. And you know it.
As a willful misleader, you shall henceforth be known as Chicken Heart.
Chicken Heart Hitchens,
Your statements on the latest Desecration Monument to the destruction of Western civilization in London are those of a kowtower, lackey and minion.
You have revealed yourself as nothing but an apple-polisher-for-the jews pecking at a keyboard.
You fool nobody.
Yours is the land of hush-up, restriction, suppression and jewish thought control. You willingly work under the jewish blue pencil. Only a lie needs propping up by artificial means or threat of imprisonment. And there you are perpetuating the jew-lie of the holy hoax.
This means that you are a liar, Chicken Heart. You are a minion bereft of honor.
Chicken Heart Hitchens.
Your own Britain is dying, Chicken Heart. Awash in a sea of brown invaders. Yet, you cowards cannot broach the subject for fear of arrest.
You sicken me.
nice one Pat . He names the symptoms but not the cause :
” PC… two deadly serious letters
I have always loathed the expression ‘Political Correctness Gone Mad’. PC is not a joke, or an accident, or the work of irrational people.
It is a chilly, deadly-serious project to turn this country into somewhere else, by scaring conservative patriots into a defeated silence. Every so often, it reveals its true face.
Here is an example. In a Fostering Handbook (The Good Practice Guide) published in 2010 by Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council, I found the following words: ‘Because the UK is institutionally racist, all white people are implicated unless they actively oppose racism.’
There it is. That’s what they think. We are all guilty until proven innocent. The entire country is infused by a form of wickedness. So they, the Equality and Diversity Commissars, must have full powers to stamp it out.
Similarly frightening thoughts were found in the Macpherson Report into the Stephen Lawrence murder. But I have never before seen the totalitarian brutality of PC thinking expressed so clearly in an official document. And note that it is about fostering children.
When I asked Sandwell Council to confirm it was theirs, they went through several hours of foot-dragging, pointlessly demanding a copy though I had given them its full title and the relevant page number.
Eventually they said that it had been withdrawn more than a year ago. They have yet to explain why.
What concerns me is that, while the document may have been withdrawn, the thinking behind it persists in thousands of government and local authority offices throughout our country.”
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2173749/Well-House-Toadies–fake-fight-ends.html#ixzz20kBA5ZfT
or here
Their dream is a ‘British FBI’ – the reality may be our own KGB
By PETER HITCHENS
…….This is how Big Brother states are born.
You are watching it happen.
I hope the Speaker takes the Home Secretary to task for hiring NCA staff without parliamentary authority. And I hope that peers and MPs, as their forebears would have done, chuck out the whole slimy thing.
It is not Britain’s FBI. It could be Britain’s KGB.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2153728/Their-dream-British-FBI–reality-KGB.html#ixzz20kBog5Jg
Their intention is clear.
So are their methods.
Pat,
Peter Hitchens is one of the more popular writers who has a regular column on the Daily Wail. He promotes a typical conservative outlook on the UK, of course with the added NWO agenda added in. The other writer, on a par with Hitchens and his stance is of course Melanie Phillips. They both continue whining on about ‘“What has happened to Britain…blah…blah…blah.”
To the average Joe out there, one who is seeing the UK disappear down the lavatory, Hitchens and Phillips’ writings are a godsend. They’re two journalists whom people like to rally behind, as they like to promote this self righteous and moral approach to life, as it was in days gone by. However, to those who have already taken their first, few, tentative steps down the rabbit hole, these two journalists are seen for what they are; nothing more than peddlers of propaganda, promoting the agenda, that people are 100% oblivious about.
Although he states for argument’s sake that the Nazis were the most evil regime known to man over communism in Russia for the sake of the argument, anyone with half a brain knows that the two are incomparable. Moreso, what disgusts me about Hitchens is that he takes two and forgets about the daddy of them all – the crown of England, responsible for massive empire building and the enforcement of globalism on many indigenous peoples through the obliteration of their own cultures. He also likes to ignore that facts you and I both know about Judaism and Germany (launching a boycott war etc etc, Hitler wanted to retake back lands stolen from Germany in WW1).
What Hitchens does he does well. That is he continues to fill the heads of Brits with nonsense and won’t ever go into what’s really going on. Why? He either knows that to do so would mean being blacklisted from the MSM and/or he may be ignorant to what really went on. My money’s on the former.
Although your reply to Hitchens was straight to the point it’s pissing against a waterfall. He discussed with those whom he chooses to. Most likely scenario your reply will be binned once you mention the holohoax.
To finish, until I really got my head around reality, I found that Hitchens did speak of many of the problems that were affecting the UK, but of course, he likes to ignore the solutions to many of them. Those who also delve into WW2 and the many lies told, inevitably end up becoming revisionists, ridiculed and castigated by their peers, for dare questioning their reality. Hitchens will never go any deeper than what is written in the MSM about WW2 and history. His job is to promote the agenda. He does a good job.
regards
Harbinger
“it became clear that the Hitler government was intent on cruel and bloody persecution of German Jews (though the policy of extermination did not begin until after the war began and may, rather horrifyingly have been a by-product of the war). “
What “cruel and bloody persecution?” Compared to the “cruel and bloody” murder of the Russian Czar, his wife and beautiful children, as well as other nobility, intelligenstia and countless peasants exterminated by the Jewish gangsters and “Jews between the ears” that ruled and terrorized the hapless citizens of the Soviet Union, Germany’s treatment of Jews was downright humane and certainly a lot better than how the Zionist ratz have ‘treated’ and continue to ‘treat’ the Palestinians.
I still can’t fathom how any intelligent person can believe this “mother of big lies” with the incredible amount of research available on this subject which clearly debunks these scurrilous claims made by individual Jews hellbent on revenge and reparation$ and the holofraud industry. A mere cursory reading of the numerous articles and books on this subject raises very serious doubts about the truthfulness and accuracy of the official tale and ‘survivor’ accounts, especially if one is Jew-wise and hip to “da tribe’s” modus operandi to begin with!
“Adolf Hitler has undoubtedly received more publicity than any other world figure, dead or alive. His persona, that of his political colleagues, his political party; the rise and combined Capitalist/Communist destruction fall of the Third Reich, have provided sufficient written material to fell several rain forests. At the latest count 120,000 different titles. Virtually all of it the preposterous re-cycled one-sided propaganda of the victors.
This absence of objectivity is equalled only by the difficulty of discovering first-hand what the German Leader actually said or thought. It is as if we sit in a court room in which the defendant, defence counsel and defence witnesses have been excluded. The judge and jury must form an opinion based exclusively on the accusations laid by the prosecution and witnesses for the prosecution. No proof of allegation will be required, they will face no questioning, call none but their own witnesses, every accusation will be accepted without question.
Sixty years of unchallenged distortion, mischievous interpretation, bias, prejudice, the re-cycling of myths, hearsay – and what do we get: universal ignorance. An ignorance so profound that I was drawn to this conclusion. Should I invite twenty randomly picked people to provide a brief essay on major points of National Socialist history I could guarantee two certainties: twenty different answers, mostly provable poppycock.
“In no country has the historical blackout been more intense and effective than in Great Britain. Here, it has been ingeniously christened, The Iron Curtain of Discreet Silence, by the able English lawyer and historian of warfare, Frederick J.P Veale. Virtually nothing has been written to reveal the truth about British responsibility for the Second World War and its disastrous results.” So said Harry Elmer Barnes, America’s foremost revisionist historian. He was absolutely right of course.
But can’t we, the people who suffered the consequences of Europe’s most destructive brother-war be trusted to examine the whole evidence and form our own conclusions? If Hitler’s Mein Kampf (only the Bible has sold more copies this century), his speeches and opinions are the rantings of a madman as is claimed why are they not readily available so that we can judge for ourselves? Is it because the victors’ lies cannot bear the cold light of objectivity?
Here then is a rare opportunity to examine the authentic first-hand expressions uttered by the German Leader who won the hearts of minds of hundreds of millions of Europeans. These extracts have so far been undemocratically denied by the so-called ‘champions of free speech’, the tabloid hacks and the palace historians. Agree or disagree with the Fuhrer’s account of unfolding events his hopes and his fears. Whatever; the liberating experience will elevate your freedom of thought and make you less of a manipulated puppet. You will stand taller and be a better human being as a consequence.” -Michael Walsh, The Triumph of Reason–The Thinking Man’s Hitler
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/The%20Triumph%20of%20Reason.pdf
Phil
” father, Eric Ernest Hitchens , a “purse-lipped and silent” commander, whose ship HMS Jamaica helped sink Nazi Germany’s battleship Scharnhorst in the Battle of the North Cape. ”
” Hitchens’s mother having argued that “if there is going to be an upper class in this country, then Christopher is going to be in it,”[15] he was sent off to Mount House School in Tavistock in Devon at the age of eight, followed by the independent Leys School in Cambridge, and then at Balliol College in Oxford ”
” Hitchens has written of his homosexual experiences when in boarding school in his memoir, Hitch-22.[17] These experiences continued in his college years, when he allegedly had relationships with two men who eventually became a part of the Thatcher government.[18]
In the 1960s, Hitchens joined the political left, drawn by his anger over the Vietnam War, nuclear weapons, racism, and “oligarchy”, including that of “the unaccountable corporation”. He would express affinity with the politically charged countercultural and protest movements of the 1960s and 1970s. However, he deplored the rife recreational drug use of the time, which he describes as hedonistic.[19]
He joined the Labour Party in 1965, but along with the majority of the Labour students’ organization was expelled in 1967, because of what Hitchens called “Prime Minister Harold Wilson’s contemptible support for the war in Vietnam”.[20][clarification needed] Under the influence of Peter Sedgwick, who translated the writings of Russian revolutionary and Soviet dissident Victor Serge, Hitchens forged an ideological interest in Trotskyist and anti-Stalinist socialism.[14] Shortly after he joined “a small but growing post-Trotskyist Luxemburgist sect”.[21]
[edit]Journalistic career (1970–1981)
Hitchens began working as a correspondent for the magazine International Socialism,[22] published by the International Socialists, the forerunners of today’s British Socialist Workers Party. This group was broadly Trotskyist, but differed from more orthodox Trotskyist groups in its refusal to defend communist states as “workers’ states”. Their slogan was “Neither Washington nor Moscow but International Socialism”.
” In 1999, as harsh critics of Clinton, Hitchens and Carol Blue submitted an affidavit to the trial managers of the Republican Party in the impeachment of Bill Clinton. Therein they swore that their then-friend, Sidney Blumenthal, had described Monica Lewinsky as a stalker. This allegation contradicted Blumenthal’s own sworn deposition in the trial,[45] and it resulted in a hostile exchange of opinion in the public sphere between Hitchens and Blumenthal. Following the publication of Blumenthal’s The Clinton Wars, Hitchens wrote several pieces in which he accused Blumenthal of manipulating the facts.[45][46] The incident ended their friendship and sparked a “personal crisis” for Hitchens who was stridently criticised by friends for a cynical and ultimately politically futile act.[28]
Before Hitchens’ political shift, the American author and polemicist Gore Vidal was apt to speak of Hitchens as his “Dauphin” or “heir”.[47][48][49] In 2010, Hitchens attacked Vidal in a Vanity Fair piece headlined “Vidal Loco,” calling him a “crackpot” for his adoption of 9/11 conspiracy theories.”
“In 2006, in a town hall meeting in Pennsylvania debating the Jewish Tradition with Martin Amis, Hitchens commented on his political philosophy by stating, “I am no longer a socialist, but I still am a Marxist”.
” Israel–Palestine
Hitchens had said of himself, “I am an Anti-Zionist. I’m one of those people of Jewish descent who believes that Zionism would be a mistake even if there were no Palestinians.”[93]
A review of his autobiography Hitch-22 in the Jewish Daily Forward refers to Hitchens as “a prominent anti-Zionist” and says that he views Zionism “as an injustice against the Palestinians”.[94] Others have commented on his anti-Zionism as well[95] suggesting that his memoir was “marred by the occasional eruption of [his] anti-Zionism”.[96] The Jewish Daily Forward quoted him saying of Israel’s prospects for the future, “I have never been able to banish the queasy inner suspicion that Israel just did not look, or feel, either permanent or sustainable.”[94]
In Slate, Hitchens pondered the notion that, instead of curing antisemitism through the creation of a Jewish state, “Zionism has only replaced and repositioned”[97] it, saying: “there are three groups of 6 million Jews. The first 6 million live in what the Zionist movement used to call Palestine. The second 6 million live in the United States. The third 6 million are distributed mainly among Russia, France, Britain, and Argentina. Only the first group lives daily in range of missiles that can be (and are) launched by people who hate Jews.” Hitchens argued that instead of supporting Zionism, Jews should help “secularize and reform their own societies”, believing that unless one is religious, “what the hell are you doing in the greater Jerusalem area in the first place?” Indeed, Hitchens goes so far as to claim that the only justification for Zionism given by Jews is a religious one.”
and so on….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Hitchens
blah blah blah , etc ….
Mel Gibson’s Meltdown
He is sick to his empty core with Jew-hatred.
By Christopher Hitchens
” I was just in the middle of writing a long and tedious essay, about how to tell a real anti-Semite from a person who too-loudly rejects the charge of anti-Semitism, when a near-perfect real-life example came to hand. That bad actor and worse director Mel Gibson, pulled over for the alleged offense of speeding and the further alleged offense of speeding under the influence, decided that he needed to demand of the arresting officer whether he was or was not Jewish and that he furthermore needed to impart the information that all the world’s wars are begun by those of Semitic extraction.
Call me thin-skinned if you must, but I think that this qualifies. I also think that the difference between the blood-alcohol levels—and indeed the speed limits—that occasioned the booking are insufficient to explain the expletives (as Gibson has since claimed in a typically self-pitying and verbose statement put out by his publicist).
One does not abruptly decide, between the first and second vodka, or the ticks of the indicator of velocity, that the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are valid after all …….There’s a lot to dislike about Gibson. He is given to furious tirades against homosexuals of the sort that make one wonder if he has some kind of subliminal or “unaddressed” problem. ..”
( Here Hitchens , a married jewish atheist homosexual , uses one of the old fave tricks , ie , ” If you object in any way to homosexuality , your a closet queen ” )
“…His vulgar and nasty movies, which also feature this prejudice, are additionally replete with the cheapest caricatures of the English. Braveheart and The Patriot are two of the most laughable historical films ever made. (Englishmen don’t form picket lines outside movie theaters when “stereotyped,” but still.) He has told interviewers that his wife, the mother of his children, is going to hell because she subscribes to the wrong Christian sect (a view that he justifies as “a pronouncement from the chair”). And it has been obvious for some time to the most meager intelligence that he is sick to his empty core with Jew-hatred.
This is not just proved by his twistedly homoerotic spank-movie The Passion of the Christ, even though that ghastly production did focus obsessively on the one passage in the one of the four Gospels that tries to convict the Jewish people en masse of the hysterical charge of Christ-killing or “deicide.” It is validated by his fealty to his earthly father, a crackpot who belongs to a Catholic splinter group of which our Mel is a member. This group more or less lives off the stench of medieval anti-Semitism. Allow me (as one who has Mel’s father’s books to hand) to give you an example. In an attempt a few years ago to heal the breach between the Vatican and the Jews, then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger did his best to make nice. Jews did not accept Jesus as savior and redeemer, said the man who is now the pope, but they did originate monotheism. Therefore, Judaism could perhaps be regarded in some ways as an “elder brother” of Christianity. The response of Gibson senior was to say that Abel also had an elder brother. … You know what? I think that this qualifies as anti-Semitism, too…
blah blah blah , it goes on..
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2006/07/mel_gibsons_meltdown.html
Hitchens : Just another smug , lefty , Marxist atheist homo jew .
There is no inherent connection between atheism and political leftism, or any kind of politics at all.
Liar.
Just remember that atheism to Aryans will have a different meaning than the atheism of a jew. Always remember racial difference. To jews who cling to a so-called religion, their god is yah. To jews who claim to be atheists, they are god. Bolshevists simply did what they have always done as in times before. Following the dictates of their god yah, death and destruction to other nations. This is inate and there is no amount of ideas that will change this. A jew remains a jew no matter what, even if there is sprinkle of “holy water”.
I’m assuming that John worships Rabbi Joshua, one of the many Jewish Messiahs who crowded 1st and 2nd century Palestine.
Is that right, John?
Yes, I happen to be an admirer of the man who exposed the Edomite Jews and booted them out of the temple, much like Hitler himself did to the Jewish bankers in Germany.
If Jesus is historical, he was most likely an anti-Roman Jewish revolutionary associated with the Zealot movement.
Were you aware of that?
What do you mean “if” he was historical? The writers of the NT aren’t the only historical figures who wrote about Jesus.
Were you aware of that?
I’m guessing you’re one of those who completely dismisses the Bible because you believe it’s all about the Jews. There’s a big racial difference between a Judahite (which Jesus was) and a Jew even though the Jews want everyone to believe that they are real descendents of the tribe of Judah. And of course the Jews just love it that they’ve been able to dupe so many stupid people into believing that Jesus was one of them. That’s why so many Christian Zionists support everything that the Jews do. But I’m sure you already knew all that because you’re really smart.
” Hitchens was raised nominally Christian, and went to Christian boarding schools but from an early age declined to participate in communal prayers. Later in life, Hitchens discovered that he was of Jewish descent on his mother’s side. According to Hitchens, when his brother Peter took his fiancée to meet their maternal grandmother, who was then in her 90s, she said of his fiancée, “She’s Jewish, isn’t she?” and then announced: “Well, I’ve got something to tell you. So are you.” Hitchens found out that his maternal grandmother, Dorothy née Levin, was Jewish (Dorothy’s father and maternal grandfather had both been born Jewish, and Dorothy’s maternal grandmother – Hitchens’ matrilineal great-great-grandmother – was a convert to Judaism). Hitchens’ maternal grandfather converted to Judaism before marrying Dorothy Levin.[136] Hitchens’ Jewish-born ancestors were immigrants from Eastern Europe (including Poland).[137][138] In an article in the The Guardian on 14 April 2002, Hitchens stated that he could be considered Jewish because Jewish descent is traditionally traced matrilineally.[137][139] In a 2010 interview at New York Public Library, Hitchens stated that he was against circumcision, a Jewish tradition, and that he believed “if anyone wants to saw off bits of their genitalia they should do it when they’re grown up and have made the decision for themselves”.
” On 26th December, 1943, Hitchens’s father was deployed onboard HMS Jamaica when it sank the German warship, the Scharnhorst. Christopher Hitchens would refer to his father’s contribution to the war: ‘Sending a Nazi convoy raider to the bottom is a better day’s work than any I have ever done.’ “
Wiesenthal Center’s most wanted Nazi located in Budapest by tabloid
July 15, 2012
(JTA) – A fugitive Nazi war criminal who helped send 15,700 Jews to their deaths was tracked down in Budapest by a British tabloid newspaper.
The Sun newspaper on Sunday reported that it had found Ladislaus Csizsik-Csatary, 97, with the help of information supplied by the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Israel. Csizsik-Csatary had been No. 1 on the center’s Most Wanted list of Nazi criminals.
He “played a key role in the deportation of over 15,000 Jews to Auschwitz in the spring of 1944 and of hundreds of Jews to Kamenetz-Podolsk in the Ukraine, where almost all were murdered, in the summer of 1941,” said Nazi hunter Efraim Zuroff, director of the Wiesenthal Center’s Israel office.
Sun reporters Brian Flynn and Ryan Parry wrote that they found him living in a two-bedroom apartment in a “smart district” of the Hungarian capital. The Sun published photographs of Csizsik-Csatary at his apartment door and walking in the street. His whereabouts, it said, had been a mystery for 15 years.
Csizsik-Csatary had been a police commander in charge of the Jewish ghetto in Kassa, Hungary — now Kosice, Slovakia — during World War II. According to documentation provided by the Wiesenthal Center, he forced Jews to “dig ditches in frozen ground with their bare hands, made dissenting Jews take up stress positions for hours, hit them with a dog lead and oversaw a shoot-on-sight policy if they tried to escape.”
Csizsik-Csatary fled to Canada after World War II and assumed a new identity. He was sentenced to death for war crimes in absentia in Czechoslovakia in 1948.
The Sun reported that he fled Canada in 1997 after his identity was discovered and Canadian authorities stripped him of his citizenship. Canadian authorities quoted by the Sun said he had been a “commander” in the Royal Hungarian Police in Kassa in charge of officers who guarded the ghetto.
http://www.jta.org/news/article/2012/07/15/3100776/wiesenthal-centers-most-wanted-nazi-located-in-budapest-by-tabloid
Wiesenthal Center’s most wanted Nazi located in Budapest by tabloid
July 15, 2012
(JTA) – A fugitive Nazi war criminal who helped send 15,700 Jews to their deaths was tracked down in Budapest by a British tabloid newspaper.
More baseless, bullshit, fraudulent accusations. I don’t believe it one bit.
Where is is the hunt for all the Jewish international criminals that terrorized the Soviet Union with tens of millions of bona fide victims’ blood on their hands? For sure, some of these cutthroat ratz are still alive and ensconced in that Zionist haven for international criminals and old communist monsters.
Phil
Somebody put me right but, is this guy not just another collins (aka cohen) character. Remember him from the eighties with his neonazi caricature, but really a jew.
No, John and Tom Metzger were the real deal. These men have been in the fight literally for decades, and Tom Metzger is still around even today fighting the Judeo Mafia, despite all that it has cost him in his life.
Are you just another Collins character?
“Remember him from the eighties with his neonazi caricature, but really a jew.”
Sounds to me like YOU are “a jew.” If you’re not a Jew, you’re a troll or just plain ignorant. Which one is it? Your idiotic (or ignorant) statement has no basis in reality or fact. To claim pro-White spokesmen and leaders are Jewish is a very tired and old Jewish tactic.
Phil
After he died Michael Collins Piper revealed the fact that Hitchens had a sincere interest in the topic of Holocaust revisionism. Hitchens met privately with key revisionists and bought a large number of revisionist texts sold through the IHR and Willis Carto’s newspaper ‘The Spotlight’. Hitchens genuine interest in Holocaust revisionism and in the question of whether or not WW2 was needlessly fought really omes through here. Too bad the Metzgers were too spineless to provide direct and well developed answers to Hitchens questions on these topics.
The fact that Hitchens was well versed in revisionism yet still fanatically maintained the hoax© narrative publicly through all his years as a writer only confirms that he was a paid shill for Jewry.
Hitchens views on revisionism are somewhat guarded and ambiguous, but it is not fair to say he fanatically maintained the Holocaust narrative:
Christopher Hitchens calls David Irving a ‘necessary’ historian of WWII.
Hitchens views on revisionism are somewhat guarded and ambiguous, but it is not fair to say he fanatically maintained the Holocaust narrative:
Christopher Hitchens calls David Irving a ‘necessary’ historian of WWII.
Both Hitchens brothers are/were jew-dick-garglers.
The information about the Holy Hoax that the Metzgers had – was available to Hitchens.
Both of the Hitchens brothers willingly support(ed) the grand-jew-lie.
I think it was good that the Metzgers told Hitches that they “don’t care what happened to the jews”.
That was a good tactic because it effectively side-stepped Hitchens jewey holy hoax crying campaign.
Anyone who “believes” that holy hoax story is truly an idiot.
Hitchens wasn’t an idiot. He was just a water carrier for his jewish bosses.
“I think it was good that the Metzgers told Hitches that they “don’t care what happened to the jews”.”
Yes, that was great!
“Both Hitchens brothers are/were jew-dick-garglers.”
ROTFLMAO!
Phil
I think everyone should vote for obama.
obama is doing a great job of pounding the last few nails in the coffin of the already dead USA.
The corpse is starting to rot. Time to put it in the ground.
The brown masses want obama to give them money from White people.
Great.
That is what happens when you allow them to vote – in a society that is populated by White people.
White people generally work. Brown people generally don’t.
White people generally create wonderful cities. Brown people generally destroy them.
Under obama we have seen the raising of yet another Desecration Monument to the destruction of Western civilization in form of a statue to the communist plagiarist Michel King.
America is drowning is a sea of brown invaders. Uncle Sam’s bloated body is floating aimlessly amid millions of brown logs in what has become a giant backed up sewage system of 3rd worlders.
All this while the ***s loot and pillage what is left and ship it off to other lands. So it should not surprise you that even the entire F-16 production line has been literally shipped to Israel. LOL!
Romney will continue the policies of obama – which have been a continuation of the policies of bush…because they are all policies of the people who really control you.
Romney will merely put a white face on the policies of his ***ish masters while he gets us into a war with his Israeli masters enemy – Iran.
I think we should be campaigning for obama.
That will only help get the corpse buried sooner.
Once this beast is laid to rest – we can create our own system.
Free from jews and the mud masses.
Lol Pat. I enjoyed reading your posts over at Incog’s site. Been a while, but I’ve gotten even more jew wise since then.
It really doesn’t matter who anyone votes for and that includes Ron Paul. They’re voting for the jews either way. What pisses me off the most is that there are still so many Obama haters that still believe we can vote our way out of this. Obama and Romney are two sides of the same jewish coin just like every democratically elected candidate for the past 100 years.
Satan’s children aren’t going to go away because of a vote out. Especially when they’re the vote counters.
Hey John – good to see you here!
As you know, Ron Paul is merely controlled opposition – yet far too many still can’t understand the concept.
Speaking of idiocy – I’ve been keeping tabs on the Joe Arpaio investigation into obammies birth certificate.
I left the following comment on this site:
http://www.westernjournalism.com/tom-ballantyne-interviews-cold-case-posse-head-mike-zullo/#comment-116503
Let’s see if they print it.
=======
Dear Mr. Ballantyne,
I have been watching with interest the unfolding of Mr. Zullo’s investigation on this matter. I want to thank you at the outset for interviewing Mr. Zullo – and also thank Mr. Zullo for consenting to the interview. The content clearly shows the far-reaching extent of hush-up, restriction and suppression relative to this issue.
You self-identify as a “Republican”. I take this mean that you are a participant in the “Republican/Democrat” dichotomy. Interesting that we only have two viable opposing political parties – yet both of them are united in the apparent interdiction of this investigation.
Also interesting is the conformity and consonance of disparaging criticality and/or silence expressed by essentially all of the US media on this very important subject.
Logical thinking would lead one towards questioning “why”.
An astute observer would note the sequence of events which have aligned and combined is ways that form a definite pattern.
That pattern is one of deception. Coordinated deception.
This leads one to ask the obvious question: “who”? Who is responsible for this coordinated deception? Why are they doing it? How far does it go?
Ever listen to Rush Limbaugh? As you may be aware – Rush Limbaugh is employed by Premier Radio Networks. Premier Radio Networks is owned by Clear Channel Communications. Clear Channel Communications is owned by Bain in Boston.
The CEO of Bain (Orit Gadeish) is an Israeli citizen who was on Romney’s transition team when he became Governor or Mass. Her father was a high ranking officer in the Israeli Army and who was herself an Israeli intelligence officer.
Could it be that Bain is an Israeli government front company? Is that why Limbaugh never says anything critical of Israel? Is that why Limbaugh is essentially campaigning for Romney?
Why is it that some of the US media is “liberal”, some is “conservative” – yet, ALL of the US media backs Israel?
Why is it that our entire banking system is run by non-Christians?
Why is it that Hollywood is run by non-Christians?
Why is it that if anyone notices the very obvious pattern here – they are denounced as an “Anti-Semite”?
What is really going on here? That is a rhetorical question. It is obvious what is going on here.
The question is – what are we going to do about it?
Looks like they did print it and then Mr. Ballentyne dodged every question you asked and outed himself as another duped jew shill.
“I think everyone should vote for obama.”
No way! This Marxist mulatto has been a disaster! Vote for your favorite write-in candidate instead if you’re contemplating that. If not, vote racially–the non-whites always do.
Phil
The “mud masses” are not the problem. The black people are not the “problem”. The mexican immigrants are not the problem. There might be – and even of that I’m not sure – a tendency that Blacks or Browns are manipulated more easily into criminalism by jewish nation and society shaping. But 99,3 % of the problem is the jewish overall agenda. If wise and determined men ruled the nations we could even handle some mixing of nonviolent ethnicities. The final solution doesn’t necessarily have to be a very very strict division of continents and races though that’s what might be the decision of wise leaders of all races in the world because people usually prefer to associate with the kinds of their own anyway.
For example we have many Turks in Germany and this doesn’t cause a problem at all. So mixing itself is not the core problem (because 99 % of the Blacks and Browns and Yellows are peaceful and benevolent, too) but on the other hand there is, of course, no reason why we should mix in the first place.
The ultimate core problem is that jewish dominated high criminality rules big parts of the world and promotes and facilitates middle crime and petty crime. Crime in general can be quite easily reduced to ZERO though if only the leaders wanted to. And if that happened even some mixing of races could work. We only must work out a system that simply deprives and kind of criminality of any basis.
I would prefer separating races anyway because I feel purity works best in many areas. Also I would find it nice to travel through the world watching the kind of culture each race creates. But still there would have to be some kind of world wide crime gamete control. We may never allow barbarians overrunning peace people again. Every corner of the world must be cleansed from criminal energy with surgical precision.
I believe this world is not the fight between races but is the fight between extremist Jews and Gentiles (though the Gentiles don’t know they are in this fight). I’m quite sure that the very most of all “normal” low level Jews (that is maybe 98 % of all Jews) are not jew-wise, too. Most of them don’t know the Holocaust is a lie. The Jewish High Crime Animals need the lower Jews to believe the Holohoax in order to stoke their cohesion. Whether also the lower Jew and therefore any individual of the jewish race without exception is pathologically criminal from within we will see when we watch a jewish nation living hermetically sealed under themselves. We would then have to take ten jewish babies and raise them in other parts of the world within other races and observe them closely. Will a single Jew be like any other people once raised in a non-criminal world? Or will he start messing around eventually following the calls of his genes?
By the way Gregor Schwartz-Bostunitsch in his book “Jewish Imperialism” (1937) says that there was a jewish clan in South Russia (the Sigarites) that had the practice of foisting their firstborns on Christians as a foundling so he will be baptized and raised Christian. Further on they try to promote him to be a Roman Catholic or Greek Catholic Priest by any means. This they do having the conviction that sooner or later the language of his blood will prove itself and the person concerned will act on behalf of his fellow Jews.
Now doesn’t that look like the master class of subversion? ((((:
This is so crazy. ((:
Knowing the depth of this kind of subversion I still think it’s okay that Eric Hufschmid might sometimes be over sceptical towards anybody.
Until this day I think he’s a good one although he once had that TV appearance. In his latest articles he demonstrates for example how criminality could be choked off.
Is he inhibiting the movement through his scepticism? I don’t think so. He rather promotes a watchfullness that really is appropriate.
Another passing remark: There is the inconvenient phenomenon that quite some many aryan women feel some kind of more (erotically) attracted to brown-haired and brown-eyed men. Somehow they think these man are stronger and have better protectional skills. Some, of course, still prefer the ones (that might be blonde and blue-eyed) that behave less egoistic and hormone-driven.
Relevant video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuUro0Z2NNg
Paul,
I’m going to have to burst your Marxist bubble.
Your statement about Turks “not being a problem” in Germany is an outright lie. Do you think that you are addressing people who are unintelligent? Or do you think that people will just believe you because you typed something?
What about this, Paul????
Study says Turks are Germany’s worst integrated immigrants
“Immigrants of Turkish origin were also found to be the least successful in the labour market: they are often jobless, the percentage of housewives is high and many are dependent on welfare, the study said. The state of Saarland was found to have the worst record – 45 percent of its Turks had no educational qualification of any kind.”
http://www.thelocal.de/society/20090125-16987.html
========
Your statements about “blacks” are untrue. I have no idea why you comment on an issue you obviously know nothing about – but there you are anyway.
There are basically three types of individuals, who fight against honest studies of racial intelligence. The most obvious opponents are non-Whites, who don’t want their races identified as being less intelligent than the White race.
The next opponents are bleeding heart liberals, who don’t think it’s “fair” that the races are different. So, based on this “feeling,” they decide that all scientific data that proves the races are different “must be wrong.”
The most organized and virulent opponents of anyone scientifically proving that the races are unequal are the Jews.
So, Paul – which group do you belong to?
Medical science has PROVEN that genetics account for physical and cognitive differences among individuals – and entire RACES.
This is medical science fact. Not political science fiction.
A guy who you no doubt have never heard of – a Professor Rushton cites one study that involved a large number of White and Black children that brain size and IQ correlate directly. And that it is predictive from birth.
The National Collaborative Perinatal Study analyzed data from 17,000 White babies and 19,000 Black babies followed from birth to 7 years (Broman et al., 1987). Head perimeters were measured at birth for all children. At age 7, head perimeters were remeasured and IQ assessed. For both the Black and the White children, head perimeter measured at birth significantly predicted head perimeter at 7 years, and head perimeter at both ages predicted IQ!
This studied showed that White children have larger brains and higher IQs than the Black children. The most remarkable thing about this study is that WE WERE NEVER TOLD ABOUT IT!
This is a truly, impressive landmark study with a very large sample size, but the Jewish mass media made sure that us peasants never heard about it because it contradicts their liberal propaganda that “all the races are equal.”
Professor Rushton cites even more sophisticated studies that use MRI techniques to create almost exact estimates of the brain’s volume. These MRI studies are fairly expensive, but the data is producing even better support for the brain-size and intelligence correlation:
The published research that most clearly shows the correlation between brain size and intelligence employed MRI, which creates, in vivo, a three-dimensional image of the brain….The first of these MRI studies were published in the late 1980s and early 1990s in leading, refereed, mainstream journals like Intelligence (Willerman et al., 1991) and the American Journal of Psychiatry (Andreasen et al., 1993).
Paul, the facts completely contradict your statements.
I am not even going to waste any further time on this with you.
Perhaps you should start using your other pseudonym “wotan” again now.
You must be a mud person yourself.
You are a defender of mud people. Yet you resort to lies.
You haven’t traveled much have you? Get out and look around. Observe.
The world speaks for itself.
Apparently you don’t understand who reads this site. They aren’t idiots who accept your brazen bullshit.
You are a liar.
You are spreading Marxist lies.
Marxist lies about mud people.
We are not “equal”. The “equality lie” is one promoted by jews, muds and anarchists.
The mud masses are, indeed, a huge portion of the problem. As a Marxist degenerate, you cannot openly admit this fact.
You can go back to eating your own shit now.
Being a halfbreed myself (mudman?) of Dutch and Melanesian descent I fully concur with your explaination of the inherent differences between the races.
And living in Holland I’m a witness of the fact that non-White immigration has a way more negative effect than a positive one.Albeit the Turks, Morrocans, Blacks, Moluccans (my people) and even the recent invasions of Yugoslavians, Poles and other eastern Europeans, it’s evident to me that immigrants don’t have a very constructive effect on society.Especially when they come in droves.
We have a new wave of homosexual Africans and Iraqi’s coming right now!
Turks Not a Problem in Germany LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/5256354/May-Day-demonstrators-riot-in-Germany-and-Turkey.html
Turks Don’t Constitute A Crime Problem In Germany! LOL!!!
http://www.rt.com/news/germany-immigrants-turkish-police/
OK – I’ve made my point.
Paul – either you are merely deluded or you are something more sinister.
One more thing “Paul”…
Your deceptive opinions about mud people strain and contort to avoid genuine facts and veracity.
At best, you post unsupportable hypotheses postulating supposition, conjecture, and speculation. More accurately, your posts about mud people “not being a problem” are a deception. They constitute open dishonesty and disinformation. They are a distortion and evasion of reality and provable fact.
You exhibit tremendous mendacity and willfully misrepresent reality and truth provable by science fact. You engage in jewish hyperbole, inaccuracy and invention in your telling of tall tales. Your fabrication of false fiction is a fraudulent forgery consisting of guile and inaccuracy and subterfuge.
Your posts are a reflection of the true “you”.
I don’t know how anyone in their right mind (unless they’re a jew or a mud) could honestly say that the mud races are not a problem. Just look at crime statistics in the US for God’s sake.
Most Dangerous Cities in America:
1) Detroit-81% black, 10% white
2) St. Louis-51% black, 42% white
3)Flint-53% black, 40% white
4)Oakland-35% black, 23% white
5)Camden-53% black, 7% white
6) Birmingham-73% black, 23% white
7)North Charleston-49% black, 43% white
8) Memphis-61% black, 33% white
9) Richmond, Ca.- 36% black, 21% white
10) Cleveland- 51% black, 38% white
Yeah, blacks are most definitely not the problem.
Any jewish influence in this video? Actually, there just might be if you’ve ever read some of the Talmud’s finest passages lol.
FYI- Looks like a hit piece on Stephen Goodson and Deanna Spingola by a member of the tribe was just posted here: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07/17/south-africa-reserve-banks-holocaust-denier/
Stephen has been a guest on Deanna’s show a couple of times. It’s interesting that this was posted at Veterans Today b/c last year they posted an article by Ingrid Zundel that referenced Goodson’s writings.
Anyway, it looks like this member of the tribe is desperately in need of a history lesson about the holoFRAUD. And it’s really easy to comment over there–it only takes a couple of minutes to set up an account.
damn it, INCOG MAN is down
Test.
I couldn’t post my latest comment.
There was some message saying something about dublication and that my comment already has been posted although is hasn’t appeared yet…
Hm….
INCOG MAN back up again, ignore my previous post
What a relief to learn and hear that Christopher Hitchens “won’t be back” Good riddance to a pesky prick!
Approximately 34 million criminal acts were committed in the U.S. in 1992–about 94,000 crimes daily.
This is a Justice Department estimate.
We don’t know the exact number, because many, if not most, crimes are not reported.
We do know, however, that the national crime rate-crimes per capita-has tripled over the past 30 years, and at least 71 percent of all violent crimes involve some kind of economic loss.
Prior to 1986, Hispanics were classified as a distinct and separate racial group. Not anymore.
The FBI and U.S. Census Bureau no longer distinguish between Hispanics
(who are actually Spanish speaking Indians for the most part) and Whites;
their crimes are lumped together in one ethnic pot.
The 22,354,059 Hispanics living in the U.S. do not exist, at least not in the ethnic sense when it comes to the FBI compiling criminal statistics for mainstream and news organizations.
Included by the FBI as “WHITES” is not only Hispanics, but also West Asians, Jews, Middle Easterners, North Africans, Iranians, Iraqis, Libyans, Palestinians, and refugees from the former Soviet Union.
The question that immediately comes to mind is: “Why would the FBI and the U.S. Census Bureau classify persons of Hispanic origin as being white?”
The answer might surprise you.
The FBI and the U.S. Census Bureau, along with mainstream media purposely distort criminal statistics and conveniently classify Mexican-Americans as white because they do not want the American public to know the truth–that Blacks are responsible for committing the vast majority of crimes here in the United States.
So the mud people “aren’t a problem”?
Hm.
MUD PEOPLE AREN”T A PROBLEM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_R1_afLRNo&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4nhqm8KwwA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XBExloL9y8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRsf4yX13bA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-R-lOGx3Mc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGV9vE7H7I0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix1ZNe4Zrxw&feature=related
Mud people aren’t a problem.
I was just arguing with a groid the other day who kept saying that Whites commit more crime and he was using the very stats on the FBI’s website that lump a bunch of different mud groups with Whites. No doubt the jews are behind this and I found that if you want to get a a somewhat better picture of the truth you should look at the US prison populations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_in_the_United_States
So when you crunch the numbers, you find this:
Blacks are 6 times more likely to be in prison than Whites per capita.
Hispanics are 3 times more likely to be in prison than Whites per capita.
Of course, like you stated above all many other races will still be lumped in with us Whites that shouldn’t be, but it’s a lot more accurate than those BS FBI stats.
I also found that the only two states who report Hispanic crimes in a separate category to the FBI are Texas and California. The FBI just ignores this and lumps them in with us. Bastards.
Here’s what the FBI reported for murders by race for Los Angeles for 2002:
Whites 314
Blacks 218
Asians 7
Here’s what LA reported to the FBI with the Hispanic category included:
LA Killers in 2002: Source FBI
Race Number %
——————————————-
White 26 4.8 %
Hispanic 228 53.4 %
Black 218 40.5 %
Asian 7 1.3 %
——————————————
Total 539 100.0 %
Here’s the link where I found these stats:
http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-Doc-Race&Groups-General/+Doc-Race&Groups-General-Crime/FBIHugelySkewsWhiteVsHispanicCrimeFigures.htm
Fucking incredible isn’t it? White’s committed only 4.8% of theLA murders, but the FBI wants everyone to believe that we committed 58% of them.
We are encouraged by ” the Culture ” to worship blacks for achievements that can be bested by animals , ie running fast , jumping high or far , throwing stuff , dextrous control of balls , beating opponents with fists , etc …the cheetah , the kangaroo , the gorilla , the sea-lion , the chimp , etc will out-perform any human in these fields .
Put the baddest cage-fighter in a ring with an average adolescent chimpanzee and he will be soon relieved of his fingers , genitals , even his arms .
Certainly his arrogance !
For example :
Usain Bolt: The Fastest Man Alive -
” An intimate portrait of athlete Usain Bolt, the fastest man in the world. In the London 2012 Olympics, Bolt will try to retain his three Olympic titles and his three world records. On the night of the 100m final, over four billion viewers will watch him as he attempts to enter the history books by becoming the first man ever to retain the 100m gold medal.
French producer/director Gael Leiblang secured exclusive access to Usain Bolt, and has been filming up close and personal with him over the last 12 months as he prepares for the biggest race of his life. Made with his complete co-operation, it features Bolt in his home environment away from the cameras. It also features all the people who have helped get Bolt to the top of his profession – his relatives, his best friends and the Jamaican national coach. ”
( BBC )
or
Can Anyone Beat Bolt? -
” He is the fastest man who has ever lived ( A TOTALLY UNPROVABLE CLAIM ! ) and on 5th August the world will be watching and expecting Usain Bolt to reclaim the greatest prize in the Olympic Games, the men’s 100 metres title. But there are five men who have been thinking the unthinkable, five men preparing and plotting to defeat the man they say cannot be downed. Five men devoted to beating Bolt.
They are: Jamaica’s Yohan Blake, the current world champion, who is Bolt’s training partner and strongest challenger; Asafa Powell, often the forgotten man of Jamaican sprinting, but still the last man to hold the world record before Bolt; Tyson Gay and Justin Gatlin, who lead the American charge hitting top form when it matters most; and Europe’s best hope, the Frenchman Christophe Lemaitre, who is proving that white men can sprint and take on the very best.
This film follows the fortunes of the world’s best sprinters as they prepare for that ultimate showdown at London 2012, from the supremely confident superstar Bolt to his focused, sometimes shy, rivals, determined to prove that Bolt is just a man.
We witness the sacrifice and growing self-belief of these athletes as they push themselves to the limit physically and mentally to claim the greatest prize in sport. All the time obsessed with their quarry, the tall Jamaican who rewrote what was possible in human speed.
Can they really beat Bolt when it matters most? Do the five strongest contenders have what it takes? What will it take? Will Bolt beat himself?
Narrated by Reggie Yates ( black of course ) and with expert contribution from sprinting icon Michael Johnson, Can Anyone Beat Bolt? is a fascinating examination of five super-fast men and one undisputed king. ”
( BBC )
Im more impressed by feats that animals CANT perform , for example :
” Engineering Giants -
1. Jumbo Jet Strip-Down
Engineer turned comedian Tom Wrigglesworth and Rob Bell, rising star of mechanical engineering, climb on board Victor X-ray, a 200 ton, £200,000,000 Boeing 747.
This jumbo jet has flown over 36 million miles in its 14 year life with British Airways. Now it will be broken into tens of thousands of parts in the airline’s maintenance hangar in Cardiff, before being painstakingly reassembled and certified fit to fly again. This is the first time this complex process has ever been filmed and it provides fascinating insights into just how a 747 works.
Rob and Tom also visit the UK’s largest plane salvage centre in the Cotswolds to discover what happens to a 747 when it reaches the end of its working life, and discover how valuable parts are stripped for resale before the carcass is torn apart to be recycled. ”
( All White men , naturally )
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b01l1w71/Engineering_Giants_Jumbo_Jet_StripDown/
or even :
” BBC Proms – 2012 Season -
First Night of the Proms
The 118th season of BBC Proms gets underway at the Royal Albert Hall with a spectacular concert of all-English music. In the year of the London Olympics there is something of a relay race around the podium with no less than four conductors passing the baton in the course of the evening – Sir Roger Norrington, Sir Mark Elder, Edward Gardner and Martyn Brabbins. Welsh bass-baritone Bryn Terfel is the soloist in Delius’ evocative Sea Drift, and a quartet of Proms favourite singers feature in Elgar’s Coronation Ode – Susan Gritton, Sarah Connolly, Robert Murray and Gerald Finley. Elgar’s effervescent Cockaigne Overture, Tippett’s Suite for the Birthday of Prince Charles and a brand new virtuosic curtain-raiser by Mark-Anthony Turnage complete the programme. The BBC Symphony Orchestra and Chorus take their traditional place on stage for a special First Night. ”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b01ktg2r/BBC_Proms_2012_Season_First_Night_of_the_Proms/
There are , of course , wise / clever / intellectual blacks , and many , many , stupid whites , but , fuck it . I think we all know whats going on .
Without sex-music , rap , and sport , ” Da Kidz ” would be struggling to find black idols to put up on their bedroom walls .
Good points GTR-man.
Reminds me of something a colleague (he’s White I’m half) said recently.We were talking about difference in intelligence between races and he said:”Africans are pretty smart, they make cool toys with just a few copper strings and other waste materials” I replied:”Well ”you” make whole factories which produces toys far more efficient and of higher quality with the materials at hand.”
I remember a film called ” White Men Cant Jump ” , but I never saw one called , ” Black Men Cant Swim ” ……or was it ” Think ” ?
” Think ” or ” Swim ” ….I must be typing with a lisp ..
One of Dukes best vids :
Race is More than Skin Color!
Hey GTRman,
Check out this White man who can jump, Jacob Tucker. He’s got a 52-inch vert and beat all the groids to win the 2011 NCAA dunk contest.
Heh , thanks John . And who is considered to be the most eloquent , original and skillful rapper ? Whether you hate rap / hip-hop or not , even the blacks hail Eminem as one of the greatest . And , err , wasnt the worlds best known / most popular reggae artists , err , white ? ( Im talking about Bob Marley of course . Always referred to as black , but was at least 50% white .
I say 50% cos a lot of the ” slaves ” like his mom’s ancestors picked up a few Euro genes over time ..)
Like the Brit F1 driver , Louis Hamilton , or the Brit boxer David Haye , or even some guy who seems to be runnin’ tings in de Whitehouse , they are always referred to as black .
All had white mothers and out-performed ” full ” blacks .
Just another Cohencidence , Im sure .
Sorry ZCF , I realise your site is not focused on these issues .
Forgive me .
Mohammed Ali always looked to me like he may have had had some cream in his coffee .
Maybe , maybe not . Something made him special .
Im sure you’ve all seen this . Even back then , the mostly white audience cringes at ” wrongthink ” . Until it’s explained , and then they applaud !
Love that clip. I show it to a lot of libtards and it makes them very uneasy because they know that Ali is making sense.
The guys that scale the tallest buildings ..the guys that throw themselves off those same buildings with a parachute ..the guys that sling a highwire between two skyscrapers ..the bunjee jumpers , the extreme skiers , the deepest divers , the spacewalkers , the mountain climbers , the free-climbers , the slack liners …
Stoopid cowardly inferior white Men , eh , Micheal Moore ?
Its ALWAYS white men or women.
I see white anthropologists cooing over a childish dot-painting by an Aboriginal woman in Oz as if it were a miracle , but they are filming this on a high-def digital camera witha battery life of six hours !!!
” Under his robe he has a jazz-trumpet ” ( 2.25 ) I’ll bet he has , the filthy bugger !
Pat, you are very stupid. And by the way I’m not “wotan” which proves you might claim things although you’re wrong.
You are simply unable to differentiate between problem und root problem. I made my point very clear. But you decide to not understand it on purpose it seems.
I rather suspect you want to stain this truth movement by advocating this stupid exaggerate mud shit.
I do know that there are obvious differences between races. And I also suspect that Whites in general have the least inclination to get criminal. But to create the impression that as good as each individual of non-white races is potentially criminal etc. is nothing but stupid and to me looks like the delibarate sabotage of the truth movement. What you do is like dressing up as a Nazi and then bashing some Turks with baseball bats although true Benevolents and Truthers and Wisers (“Aryans” if you want) would not resort to behaviour like this.
The true White might know of his high capability of invention and intellect but his nature is not as disgusting as the Jews’ who would brag about it.
You are giving a bad example of a White if you go around and tell the whole world how superb you are and how big your brain is compared to others. The true White is more intelligent and shows more sense of tact.
In order to give this movement a bad image you go for the “mud masses”. You try to make 97 % of the world’s people consider they are mud and therefore you do the worst imaginable damage to the truth movement because this creates some kind of Mud-vs.-White-feeling.
I did travel the world a lot so I do know that most of the “mud people” are very benevolent and peaceful all over the world. They offer you a place to sleep and food.
Turkish women in Germany might works less and might not be able to compete with german engineers but they are very peaceful and friendly.
I live in Germany and I tell you most of the Turks are very nice and friendly and helpful people. They try to make their living without getting criminal.
I say yes, I think it’s better for them to live in Turkey.
We all know the jewish agenda to weaken the Whites through immigration. And yes, most crimes are done by foreigners. But these statistics don’t tell you about all the foreigners in a country who don’t get criminal at all.
So once again I tell you: “Mud” is not the core problem because then we would have a problem, wouldn’t we? But that is what you want obviously.
The core problem is that this world is shaped by crime magnates who put all their trillions of dollars and human energy they have in the creation of crime.
Your postings to me seem quite too emotional and intrusive to be of wise aryan buddhist kind.
I am very much pro racial division but I also know that most “mud people” are not crime-loving. Before I’d say “mud” is the problem I’d say men compared to women are the problem. Get out your statistics on how many percent of all crimes are committed by men compared to women then you see the “real problem”.
I wish every race had their own nation fully to themselves. I even thought about moving to Iceland or Norway because I felt like going to a place where most pure Whites are left.
We must fight crime, not “mud”.
If “mud” can’t be criminal anymore you will see how much friendly and peaceful mud there is out there.
We must educate on race and non-crime but we must not encourage the races to spit at each other. All you (Pat) do is what the Jews do all the time with their media control: Instigate racial clashes (though keeping Jews out of the line of fire).
So either you are stupid or you act on purpose (which would mean that you are stupid also).
Metzger’s a Jew tool. The type of “in your face” immature guy that the media will trot out to show us how evil “racism” and white people are. Like having KKK guys on Jerry Springer. I never trusted the guy.
For those of you who defend Metzger: why? Do you read his material? It’s mostly incoherent rambling and commentary with ridiculous cartoons in between. You can find the same stuff on Ni–ermania. He does nothing productive in exposing Jews (unlike Prothink and Duke, who at least make popular videos), and at the same time he makes us all look like stereotypical confederate idiots. To me he’s just another Collins, Koehl, Klassen, etc.
I don’t agree Metzger is incoherent or rambling. He’s white working class. I’ve listened to a 2-hour interview, watched one of his own videos, and paid attention to his growth and his politics. He’s not a perfect, but he’s not an idiot.
What’s so wrong with Klassen? What’s your take on him?