Artwork courtesy Gauleiter
This time Deanna Spingola and I mainly discussed the holohoax as well as shills in the “truth” movement and their tactics to push Jewish disinformation on unsuspecting people seeking answers. We also touched on the lies told about Hitler, Nazi Germany and the slanderous disinfo peddlers who relentlessly smear Hitler’s good name and why we must fight these lies to bring down the Jew World Order.
Print 
PDF
Excellent interview, yet again. The lies about Hitler are never ending it seems, I see them all over the internet. Hitler and the National Socialists were agents of the Rothschilds, Hitler was a Jew, Hitler was a Tavistock puppet/British agent, Hitler and the National Socialists were homosexuals, blah blah blah. It’s so ridiculous and totally discredits anyone promoting this stuff. I just removed Henry Makow from my blog, sick and tired of his anti-Hitler BS, although he does have some good articles from time to time.
On a future show, maybe you guys could focus on National Socialist ideology and what their vision of Germany and Europe looked like. I just read Hitler & Himmler Uncensored, which gives a glimpse into National Socialist ideology, but it may be a good topic for you guys to talk about.
Also, where did the term “Nazi” come from? A lot of Patriotards (I like that!) link “Nazis” to Ashkenazis, ie, the Nazis were really Jews or Jew puppets. I try to avoid using the term “Nazi” at all, because it just seems like a fraudulent, manufactured term, and I’ve had others tell me that as well. Maybe you or someone here could clarify this.
Keep up the good work man, the two central pillars of the Jew World Order, the Holohoax and 9/11, are crumbling day by day thanks in large measure to your efforts. And of course Deanna’s.
The word “Nazi” was an acronym formed from the first syllable of NAtional and the second syllable of SoZIalist as in Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Workers’ Party).
The term Nazi was not used by Hitler or his Party members, they always referred to themselves as National Socialists. During NS rule in Germany Nazi was commonly used in the foreign Jewish press to refer to them.
You write: {On a future show, maybe you guys could focus on National Socialist ideology and what their vision of Germany and Europe looked like.}
Well, of course, the greatest insight into National Socialist ideology and Hitler’s vision for Germany and Europe can be found in his book, Mein Kampf http://www.zioncrimefactory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Mein-Kampf-by-Adolf-Hitler.pdf
Not all the members of the NSDAP saw eye to eye on everything, but here are two other good resources on their general worldview.
Nazi Sozi – Questions & Answers for National Socialists by Joseph Goebbels
http://ia700201.us.archive.org/11/items/NaziSozi/Nazi-Sozi.pdf
The 25-point program of the NSDAP
Thanks, I’ll check it out.
Hi, the “nazi” term it is NOT an acronym of nationalsozialistischen…
…The term “Nazi” (along with “Nazism”) is a political epithet invented by Konrad Heiden (7 August 1901 – 18 June 1966) during the 1920s as a means of denigrating the NSDAP and National Socialism.
It would be like saying “nutsy”. So, if for no other reason, one should easily understand why the term was regarded as derogatory by the National Socialists and why they would NEVER use it to describe themselves.
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/exposing-the-nazi-epithet-who-started-it-why-how-and-who-benefits/
Quite mistaken. “Nazi” is simply the first two syllables of “national” in German, and so a common abbreviation. Compare the ubiquitous “Ami” for “amerikanische”, at the time
The term Nazi may have been used by the Social Democrats in Germany to descredit
nationally minded Germans. Those in turn retaliated by calling those of the other
quarter Sozis. It was only after the war that this term aquired real popularity as an
offensive word against all who oppose the Jewish agenda. For this purpse the term
has been varied to Neo-Nazi. Contrary to what some believe, and what you seem to
be indicating in your article, the word Nazi has nothing to do with the Anglosaxon
language nor has it anything to do with the broad Jewish agenda, as is occasionally stated, but that doesn`t mean it has nothing to do with the Jews as at the time in question
they were hiding in the ranks of Social Democrats and Comunists in Germany.
ZCF and Deanna, another great show. Cheers! Every one of these shows is like a giant hammer smashing down on a poor innocent ‘poisecuted’ kike’s yarmulke! Keep it up 1488
Dear Deanna & ZCF,
I have taken the time to listen to your discussion from start to finish. This is what has
specifically impressed me and / or causes me to comment:
I have noted your comment, Deanna, that the Jews are trying to bring down Christianity.
Like yourself I know why they are doing that and I can think of quite a few people,
who would be well advised to think about your comment.
Dear ZCF, you have slipped up a couple of times with terms like Naziism or Nazi-
Germany – see also my above comment. In saying that I must state with absolute
clarity: It was nothing but a slip up.
The theme has been touched upon that in the multi-coloured world of the Internet there
also seem to be some “good jews”, who seem to be saying the right things. Perhaps
it would be helpful to consider that the Jew is always working on many fronts. Should
there be any revolutionary developments in the foreseeable future it may be the “good
Jews”, who will be spared. I fear they may be the basis in a post revolutionary era for
this entire Jewish game to start again.
From the discussions I also came to the conclusion that the term capitalism requires
a little further comment. Capitalism in its classical form (essential utilities
to be run by the state, as much economic activity as possible handled by private
enterprise) is by far superior to Comunism for one simple reason: Making profit
to improve your life and that of your family is by far the biggest natural motivating
factor in human psychology. The problem today is that the corporations are no
longer in the hands of benevolent and endegenous entrepreneurs, who look after
their workers, pay their taxes and spend their earned profits in the country where
they have earned it. No, today the corporations are in the hands of international
criminal syndicates, who don`t care for their workers nor for the country that
has put up the infrastructure for them to become rich. Their aim is nothing else than sucking
from the labour of the people and transferring the wealth to Israel. This is predatory
capitalism and not capitalism. Whilst I have noted that Hitler has said that capitalism
and Comunism have found a strange coomon agenda to involve Germany in a destructive
war I think he may have been caught up in the terminology of the day (as it happens to
all of us accasionally) without realising that the finest form of capitalism was practiced in Germany
from 1933 going. There is one prominent country in today`s world that practices German
capitalism giving international hyenas at best a 49% say and that country is performing
today the same economic miracles that Germany was performing in the thirties.
Deanna, you have said nobody should trust you without second thought and ZCF has replied
to this that he also
is not forcing anybody to be an uncritical believer of what he says. Having listened to your
broadcast I want to tell both of you: I have 100% faith in both of you as honest brokers of our
common cause and I feel you are 100% on the right line! You have truly recognised the
cause of the destruction, which is unfolding before our very eyes.
An excellent interview yet again, Deanna and yourself make a good team and share some great knowledge. Thanks very much for all your hard work and congratulations for an excellent website.
These uncensored interviews are the best, now if we can break Deanna’s jewdeo masonic christian programming there may still be hope.
First things first, everybody go get their favorite jew book (bible) and see if it has a masonic square and compass on the cover.
Like these holy masonic jew bibles:
https://www.google.com/search?q=masonic+bible&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7ACAW_enUS468US468&prmd=imvnsb&source=lnms&tbm=isch&ei=DiXDT8aQIdPjsQLtrqXhCg&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=2&ved=0CHEQ_AUoAQ&biw=863&bih=369
Now for some new testament christian values right out of the jew book.
Matthew 14:26 If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.
Matthew 10:34-39
Christ Brings Division
34 “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. 35 For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; 36 and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’[a] 37 He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. 38 And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. 39 He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for My sake will find it.
Matthew 5:39
But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Matthew 15:24
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Here the wonderful jewdeo-christians prove how merciful and righteous christardanity is.
A SHORT HISTORY of CHRISTIANIZING the GERMANIC PEOPLES
Why are we returning to Asatru, our native spirituality and renouncing Christianity which has been the dominant religion of our peoples for over one thousand years? An equally important question to answer is “Why did our ancestors leave their native religion in the first place?”… Historical evidence has shown that long ago our people were taken from their ancient spirituality through deliberate treachery, deceit, threats and violent forceful means of making the various Germanic tribes accept Christianity, they did this by:
1.DECEIT; Falsifying the true nature and content of the teachings of Christianity.
2.TREATCHERY/ CO-ERSION; Christian missionaries desacralized and demonized the Germanic deities declaring that they are really demons, witches or as in the case of Odin, Satan himself. They also further lessened their status by turning many of them into Christian saints. There was strong pressure from Economic sanctions imposed by the Christian law forbidding business transactions between Heathens & Christians, unless the Heathen would accept the Christian religion and baptism.
3.THEFT; Directly and purposefully stealing many Germanic heathen Holy Days, traditions, symbolism, and vocabulary and converting these to have Christian meanings.
4.VIOLENT FORCE; Genocidal wars, murder.
725AD – St.Bonface desecrates and cuts down the ancient Donar (Thor) Oak Tree near Fitzlar, Hesse. Subsequently the Pope appoints St.Boniface the metropolitan of Germany for his “good” work in spreading Christianity.
746AD – The Christian Frankish Duke Karlmann murdered thousands of Heathen Alemannic Germans in what became known as the “Blood bath of Cannstadt”
750AD – The Saxons avenged themselves upon their Christian aggressors by invading France and sacking 30 monasteries.
772AD – Charlemagne begins his 30 year genocidal war against the Heathen Germans to convert them to Christianity. He destroys their sacred temples, holy groves, and cuts down the sacred tree Irminsul. (Charles earned his honourific title of “The Great” – le mange – from Christian historians for spreading Christianity by force, brutality and murder). Charlemagne imposed a tithe on all Christians in his kingdom to further support the spread of Christianity by militaristic means.
782AD – Charlemagne has 4500 heathen Saxon German nobles executed at Verden, for the crime of not converting to Christ.
804AD – Charlemagne wages his last war against the last remaining heathen Saxons, he succeeds in conquering them and forcing them to nominally accept Christianity under pain of death, and thus extends his empire to the Elbe.
829AD – Christian missionaries arrive in Sweden. They are met with a lot of opposition from the heathen Vikings and the Sami who did not wish to convert to Christ.
1100AD – Zealous Christian missionaries destroy the great heathen temple at Old Uppsala in Sweden, replacing it with a Christian church
1100AD – 1200 – On Church orders over 2 million German men and Women in what is known today as Austria, Switzerland and Southern Germany were mercilessly slaughtered because they would not convert to Christ.
1212AD – “The Children’s Crusade” 50,000 German and French children are torn from their families and pressed into military service in the Middle East. Many died miserably of violence, Hunger, Sickness. Few ever returned home to their families.
1234AD – Over 10,000 German men, Women, and Children were killed at the command of the Bremen archbishop because they were “heritics”.
http://www.odinsvolk.ca/WhyAsatru2.htm
It has served us well this myth of Christ. — Pope Leo X
“When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said, ‘Let us pray.’ We closed our eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land.” — Desmond Tutu
Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity.
-Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782
Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 10, 1787
We are the joyous Hitler youth,
We do not need any Christian virtue
Our leader is our savior
The Pope and Rabbi shall be gone
We want to be pagans once again.”
- Song sung by Hitler youth
“The heaviest blow which ever struck humanity was Christianity; Bolshevism is Christianity’s illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew.”
- Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens, trans., (Oxford, 1953), Hitler’s Table-Talk, p. 7
——————————————————————————–
“The law of selection justifies this incessant struggle, by allowing the survival of the fittest. Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure.”
- Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens, trans., (Oxford, 1953), Hitler’s Table-Talk, p. 51
Endless Proof that the Nazis were Totally Anti-Christian
“I adopted it as my view,” he wrote, “that the Christian doctrine and the way of life it had given to the people was the basic cause of the whole evil, and that it served solely as a means for obtaining the Jew the mastery of the world, which had been granted to him by Jehovah…For instance, the Diktat of Versailles was signed on June 28, 1919, the fifth anniversary of the assassination of the archducal pair at Sarajevo. At the time I did not suspect the parallelism of the dates, nor have any idea that cabalistic beliefs had determined them. Even less did I realize that the murder of the archducal pair had long been planned by the world brotherhood of the Freemasons, in order to unleash in the Jehovah year 1914 the World War which had been decided upon by the Grand-Orient Lodge of France at Paris and furthered by Rome.“
–General Erich Ludendorff
He was uplifted by these revelations, for they proved what he had always believed in his heart–that Germany had not lost the war in fair battle, but had been defeated by international Jewry, Freemasonry, and the conspiracies of the Church of Rome.
–From the book ‘The Reich Marshal: A Biography of Hermann Goering by Leonard Mosley © 1974
http://spiritualwarfare666.webs.com/Nazis_Anti-Christian.htm
The anti-Christian nature of the Hitler Youth in 1935
http://www.westerncivforum.com/index.php?topic=2149.0
Baldur von Schirach Cross-Examination Testimony Nuremberg Nazi Major War Criminals Trial 5-24-46
D, I’m a simple goy boy raised to believe that Christianity was bullshit. Not sure where I got that but I did watch a lot of TV. Never went to Church. Did always admire Jesus while realizing that his followers were prone to error.
Now, the biscuit here is that I been reading them Protocols and that filthy Talmud. It turns out that the Jews HATE Christianity and use Jew materialism to corrupt and destroy the Goyim. Hmmm……
The stodge-podge of quotations are typical Mikey “Nazi Boogie” Rivero, Jew liberal half-truth, Jew-truth ordures. A couple of examples and links for those who can see the Jewiness of the anti-Christian agenda:
1) “The heaviest blow which ever struck humanity was Christianity; Bolshevism is Christianity’s illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew.”
Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens, trans., (Oxford, 1953), Hitler’s Table-Talk, p. 7 <- this is unadulterated Jewish propaganda that only fools would accept…you know those who are too lazy to study the roots of Bolshevism or its history. Not sure this is a Mikey-ism but he'd use if it were laying around.
2) It has served us well this myth of Christ. — Pope Leo X. Since Mikey "Nazi, Nazi" Rivero refuses to acknowledge the LONG history of Jewish crimes, he is able to throw up a Jew-pope like Leo X and pretend that such views represent whatreallyChristianChurchHappened. Were he to present the historical record, he would not be able to pretend that Leo was a legitimate Pope and ignore that he was a Jewish tool.
Were he to read E. Michael Jones' masterpiece, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, he would learn that the Inquisition was the natural reaction to crypto-Jew infestation. Furthermore, he would discover that the Church was tolerant of the Jews until Nicholas Donin revealed what the filthy Talmud taught: active hatred of Christianity, Christians, and general murder, mayhem, and thievery. Rivero would also learn that the Church protected the criminal Jews when public ire exploded; Jews converted, falsely and freely, in order to save their necks.
3) 1234AD – Over 10,000 German men, Women, and Children were killed at the command of the Bremen archbishop because they were “heritics” and similar. <- See E. Michael Jones for the essential context. Don't buy until you've done the research.
4) Matthew 10:34-39
Christ Brings Division
34 “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. 35 For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; 36 and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’[a] 37 He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. 38 And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. 39 He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for My sake will find it. <- Yeah, Jesus was walking around with a sword. He incited people to hate their mothers, fathers, kids etc. That's a real Jewy verion. Or how about, he was explaining to his disciples that one couldn't become like him without giving up ALL attachments (emotional, material).
Here's Elizabeth Dilling (assiduously ignored like so many other essential sources by whatMikeyHappened.com) on Leo X and the period:
Leo X, one of the Medicis who fanned the Reformation by sponsoring a great renaissance of paganism and filled the Platonic Academy and salons of Rome and Florence with Jews, expounding Talmud and occult Cabalism, is called the humanist … favorably inclined toward the Jews, whom he a employed not only as physicians, but also as artists and in other positions at his court. The beginning of the Reformation influenced his action in the controversy between Reuchlin and Pfeferkorn which he settled in such a way as not to give any encouragement to those who demanded reforms in the Church.
The story of the sincerely converted Jew, Pfefferkorn, who aired the infamies of the Talmud, as opposed by the Catholic renegade, Reuchlin, dupe of the head of the Jewish community of Rome, and the pro-Jewish Medici Pope, ended with Pfefferkorn being silenced, Reuchlin not being tried for heresy, as he was scheduled to be and indeed should have been, and with two hostile camps in nearly every German town taking sides for or against the Talmud.
One may ask: "How could anyone reading what the Talmud says [see reproductions elsewhere herein] argue about its contents?" In this regard, however, it must be remembered that only with the relatively unexpurgated Soncino translation of the Talmud in this century, in the contemporary language, English, has it become possible for the non-Jew to receive the full impact of what the Talmud says. In other trials arguments could rage as to what a Yiddish or Hebrew text of the Talmud really meant, if translated. Nevertheless, the Jews always ultimately lost such arguments, as witness the condemnation of the Talmud by non-Jews through the centuries.
Even the Soncino English translation of the Talmud is not readily available except in major libraries, to be read there and not taken out.
Clement VII (another Medici servant of Jewry) was the bastard son of Guilio, brother of Lorenzo the Magnificent, who founded a pagan salon, the Platonic Academy. The Platonic Academy attempted the old Talmudic strategy of "harmonizing" pagan philosophy with Christianity, as Maimonides had tried to do with Biblical Judaism. Lorenzo had his son Giovanni (Leo X) made a Cardinal, through his influence with Innocent VIII, at 13, having also been made an Archbishop at 7. Ready to ascend the throne, Giovanni promptly made five of his relatives Cardinals, including his bastard cousin, Giulio. Leo X (Giovanni), made Pope on March 11, 1513, was ordained a priest on the 15th and made a Bishop on the 19th of the same month, and he reigned until December 1, 1521, nine years.
It was this Pope, Leo X, who launched the selling of indulgences in 1517, the immediate cause of Luther's break with the Church, and of Europe's arousal. Every effort was made to corrupt and Talmudize the Church from the inside, while Jewry worked to wreck it from the outside. The hotheads among Jews, says Jewish historian Cecil Roth, expected to end Christianity and supplant it with Talmudism.
What “context” could possibly justify the cold-blooded murder of more than 10,000 White men, women and children?
Fuck E Michael Jones and anyone else who would try to excuse such a heinous atrocity against our race.
E. Michael Jones is a Catholic crank who says that Jews are a religious group and that converting them to Christianity will solve the Jewish problem.
Christians have no answers to the Jewish problem, or anything else for that matter. That’s by design, of course. Jews created Christianity for the purpose of serving as false opposition.
Could you be more specific? His book is full of examples of false conversions and honest ones.
Christianity is inherently “anti-Semitic” as the Jews have always know, hence, it foaming at the mouth hatred. No matter what the tards may say.
There is no difference between a “false” Christian and an “honest” Christian, because there has not yet been developed a test to determine a person’s belief in the “supernatural”.
Christianity was developed by ancient Jews living in the Roman Empire. Christianity is basically Hellenized Judaism. It’s Judaism combined with elements of the Hellenistic mystery cults.
Christianity is not now, nor has it ever been, anti-Semitic. Anti-Semitism is defined as “biological opposition to the Jews.” Christianity has never opposed Jews as a biological group, only as a religious group. Christianity denies that Jews are a biological group. In fact, Christianity denies that human biology matters at all, or even exists in the first place. Christianity has only ever opposed Jews on theological/religious grounds, the same basis on which Christianity opposes all other religious groups, e.g. Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, etc.
You are completely wrong about this subject.
Yo, NML, don’t forget the “Nazis killed Six Million Jews in Gas Chambers”. You’re right, no need for context or reading everything is so clear.
Yeah, screw Jones. He doesn’t know jack compared to us. Right on, bro!
Since you artfully avoided my question, I’ll ask it again:
What “context” could possibly justify the cold-blooded murder of more than 10,000 White men, women and children?
Being an apologist for an ancient Jewish mystery cult is not very becoming.
Christ was Jew, Christ was gay, Christ was a dupe of the Jews, Christ was fictional, Christ was a Reptilian, yada fuckin’ yada. I’ve heard this shite somewhere before. Work it baby, work it!
Guys, please lay off the religious jabbering in this thread. This show had nothing to do with religion, and, as you all know, I am atheist and don’t like being constantly reminded of these superstitious fables.
People should just keep their personal religious beliefs to themselves. It adds nothing to the discussion of the Jewish question, and is designed to muddy the waters.
@ ZionCrimeFactory
May 29, 2012 at 1:59 am
It is of course and must be everybody`s individual and private choice what spiritual belief he may
wish to follow, be it Christianity, Agnosticism, Atheism or anything else. Insofar it shows astonishing
tolerance on your part when you allow in your commentary section certain people to over-represent
themselves, who do not seem to understand this. But it is one thing to be over-exposed to biblical
quotations, which seems to exhaust the contributory potential of some writers, and it would be
another thing to say that no discussion is desired on the 2000 year old institutions of Christianity,
which have brought so much good, but also so much bad to the people of this world. When one
considers that hundreds of millions of people, especially in the western hemisphere,
believe in the doctrines of the Christian churches and when one looks closer at what are the
classical doctrines of these Churches vis a vis the Jews, then it would be my considered opinion
that meaningful discussion on the role of these institutions in western societies and what may
have caused them to give up traditional positions in past decades, such as that the Jews are the children of Satan,
would not be harmful to variety, content and/or standard of the comments on your site. After all,
Adolf Hitler was also realistic enough to make a pact
with the Vatican and he was, by birth, a Christian as
was and is the vast majority of the German population,
even though mostly in a tradionalist sense.
But do we not want to hold all these people together
and lead them to where they were before?
Or do we want to uncompromisingly affront them?
Christianity is a third world non-White religion. The majority of the world’s Christian population is non-White, and the percentage grows every year. Were you aware of that?
@ Z.O.G.
May 30, 2012 at 8:54 am
Yes, I am aware of that. There are many different reasons for this. For me the
most important reason is that the Jews are gradually infiltrating the Christian
Churches with the aim of turning them into Judaic-Christian Churches, to rewrite
the NT and to rewrite the history of the occident. That is
the reason why I left the Roman Catholic Church a number of years ago, else
I would probably have remained a passive traditionalist member and
continued to pay my dues.
Adolf Hitler: His Quotes Regarding Christianity
The following quotes were taken from “Hitler Speaks: A Series of Political Conversations With Adolf Hitler on His Real Aims” By Hermann Rauschning, 1st edition, 1939
“Leave the hair-splitting to others. Whether it’s the Old Testament or the New, or simply the sayings of Jesus, it’s all the same old Jewish swindle. It will not make us free. A German church, a German Christianity is a distortion. One is either a German or a Christian. You cannot be both.”
“Hitler made it clear that he was not interested in an “Aryanized Christianity” or the “Aryan Jesus” myth promoted by Houston Stewart Chamberlain, Von Liebenfels, and certain party members. “You cannot make an Aryan out of Jesus, that’s nonsense. What needs to be done you say? I will tell you: we must prevent the churches from doing anything but, what they are doing now, that is, losing ground day by day. But we can hasten matters. The parsons will be made to dig their own graves.” he stated.”
http://spiritualwarfare666.webs.com/Hitler_Quotes_Against_Christianity.htm
Wotan, Christianity started out as a non-White religion. It developed in the multi-racial slums of the Eastern half of the Roman Empire. So modern Christianity is just returning to its non-White roots.
Be ministers ‘NOT’ of the letter, for the letter kills, but of the SPIRIT … father, mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters etc etc are all SYMBOL of SPIRITUAL characteristics WITHIN each of us .. NOT LITERAL … and thats the problem… the terms Israel, Jew, Hebrew, Abraham, Jerusalem etc etc are all SYMBOLS of INNER things, NOT a physical, geographic location or physical race of people etc.. the ‘ministers of darkness’ take that which is of the Light, using the same texts and symbols and perverse it, reverse the meanings etc hence you have anti- christ and christ … good and evil … light and darkness .. etc etc .. and so the ‘ministers of darkness’ succeed in not only putting people on the wrong track but also in preventing them from searching beneath the surface for the SPIRITUAL meaning .. those that do will not be understood by those that are happy rummaging around in the ‘mud’, as Truth is always hidden (occulted) it is this way with any subject, Hitler being a prime example, you must dig beneath the surface ( seek that which has been occulted ), and you will know yourselves that you won’t be understood by the ‘masses’ .. why beacuse they are as ‘swine’ ( a symbol for those that live only on the material, literal, surface ) hence the saying of ‘Jesus’ .. ‘cast not your PEARLS to the ‘swine’ .. Matthew 7:6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn again and REND YOU’ … think about that !!!
No i am not a Christian nor a member of any religious system, just a seeker of Truth.
May i offer some clues to understanding the symbols used:
Dogs – dogs of that time were not the pampered and well trained pets we know of today, and therefore since a dog is an ‘animal’ it refers to the ‘LOWER NATURE’, it was to unrestrained LOWER qualities and not good higher ones that the term dog was used for.
Swine – a symbol of the LOWER DESIRES, PASSIONS, INSTINCTS, signifying an efil state , depraved and unclean ( not eating pork was never the meaning, not partaking of this lower nature is the spiritual meaning )
Pearls – a symbol of HIGHER truths and emotions – it is the symbol of the ‘Christ Light’ WITHIN
This is pure psychology, the science of Mind.
It is a true statement, not just about the Bible but any subject, you seek beneath the surface for that which has been hidden, try to share that with others who are happy as swine, and what do you experience ? … for certain the ‘ministers of darkness’ will turn and REND YOU and maybe also will some of your friends and loved ones. Is this not what has happened with Hitler ?
When Jesus used the word “swine” in that saying, he was referring to gentiles/non-Jews.
As for Miss Spingola’s personal beliefs i can only offer this view: listen to her and her HEART will tell you her beliefs, i personally don’t see that anyone has a right to try ‘break’ her beliefs … its in her HEART. Miss Spingola’s ‘beliefs’ are not based on the ‘dead letter’, it goes far deeper…. in fact we could all learn from Miss Spingola.
London, first you say it is the science of Mind. Then you say it’s in the heart for Miss Spingola. This is double think. You can’t have it both ways. The mind and the heart are two different organs.
It may be to you Carmen, not to me. There is a relationship between Heart and Mind ( i’m not talking about physical organs ) i’m talking spiritually.
@ londontruthseeker
May 28, 2012 at 5:28 pm
The difference you are making between heart and mind is one, which
most people would make and their collective wisdom has found expression
in the phrase “the heart knows reasons, which reason will never know”.
Whilst your kind and explanatory words for Deanna are much apprcieated
I would add that all statements made by anybody anywhere anytime are
in some way the result of both of these human attributes. Thanks God that
Deanna is not a hard disc!
Destroyer says:
May 28, 2012 at 2:06 pm
Destroyer says:
May 28, 2012 at 3:18 pm
When you said that Horst Wessel was turned into a martyr by Göbbel`s propaganda
I knew you were off the rails and that not in a small way.
Now you are saying you want to break Deanna, because she is a programmed Jew
and a mason. This really shows that you have taken leave of your senses and indeed,
there are justifieable doubts if you were, at least at the time of writing, in possession of
all your faculties.
It is also quite clear that you don`t understand some of the texts, which are are marketing
here, neither do you understand what is mainstream and what is sideline of any arbitrary
epoch. I am further of the opinion that for what are ZCF`s declared aims and objectives
with his site you are not an asset but rather a liability by an undeterminable factor.
I have carfully considered if I should even upgrade your rants with a reply, but it was in the
end your ill mannered behaviour regarding the person of Deanna, which has prompted me to
write this comment. I am certainly not available for further comments on your confused
ramblings, which do not reach by any parameter even the most minimum standards of
of what a coherent “Weltanschauung” would require.
“It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. Nor had I ever wished that after the appalling first World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America.” – Adolf Hitler, April, 1945.
The joke doing the rounds of the British Union of Fascists at this time, was that the Jewish national anthem was, ‘Onward Christian Soldiers.’
Onward Christian Soldiers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9DHgnKeAxo
When Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt met in 1941 on the battleship HMS Prince of Wales to agree the Atlantic Charter, a church service was held for which Prime Minister Churchill chose the hymns. He chose “Onward, Christian Soldiers” and afterwards made a radio broadcast explaining this choice:[7]
We sang “Onward, Christian Soldiers” indeed, and I felt that this was no vain presumption, but that we had the right to feel that we serving a cause for the sake of which a trumpet has sounded from on high. When I looked upon that densely packed congregation of fighting men of the same language, of the same faith, of the same fundamental laws, of the same ideals … it swept across me that here was the only hope, but also the sure hope, of saving the world from measureless degradation.
—Winston Churchill
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onward,_Christian_Soldiers
Meant to say what a fine show it was. Another reason for the brainwashing on “the Holocaust” is Jewish projection again. The Jew Bolshevik holocaust in Russia must be buried from view by the Jew bucket brigade of Jew Nazi propagandists.
Did I mention Mikey Rivero? Funny that he and Germanic Death Cult Jones were an item for so long, and that Mikey has a firm policy of not discussing other program hosts on his lame show.
Two excellent works on the Jews and their infestation of the “Russian Revolution” are Malcolm Muggeridge’s Winter in Moscow and Donald Day’s Onward Christian Soldiers. Both writer’s were ruined for naming the Jew as the obvious controllers of the Commie apparatus. NO idea why Jews like Rivero never mentioned the horrors of Bolshevism, the Protocols, or the filthy Talmud. NO idea why such creatures fail to see that the Protomud is the template for Commie-style enslavement. Why the hell are they always barking about “Fascism,” Nazis, and the Vatican!
I really hate to do this but c’mon people, It’s time to be honest with yourselves, these rat bastard kikes want us dead.
Here’s a bible passage I found at the top of a prominent “christian” jew exposer and troofer servant for the most high jew rat, yahweh.
Revelation 2:26
And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
That, in my sensible german pagan head, is classic jew supremacism found in every last one of the jew holy books. I do not desire power over nations, that’s pure disgusting jewdeo-christian moral philisophical filth. Oops, that’s right, jew god is all for slavery so long as it’s only the goyems, lol.
Christarded jew-worshipers aka “abes” or believers in the jew god of abraham believe that people are born sinners and slaves. That’s right, Ishmael and all his gernerations are born slaves, isn’t that right you retarded muslims?
Galatians 4:22-24
22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
I feel something going on between you two. She has a sexy voice. Let her talk more, comrade!
New pro-white network going live in 10 minutes.
http://thewhitenetwork.com/
I set up this chat room so people can gather and comment on Carolyn’s new show. Grab a chatango name or enter the room anonymously.
http://thewhitenetwork.chatango.com/
Here’s a very interesting article I found recently. I recommend everyone read it. It shows just how Jewish Christianity really is.
JESUS THROUGH JEWISH EYES: A RABBI EXAMINES THE LIFE AND TEACHINGS OF JESUS
http://www.menorahministries.com/Scriptorium/JesusThruJewishEyes.htm
By Rabbi John Fischer, Ph.D., Th.D.
Oh my jew god! David Duke just validated the holohoax saying the jews still use the horrors of the holohoax to perpetrate hate on others or something to that effect. He keeps saying Thank Gaaawd! He sounds like Hagee for christ’s sake, lol.
Duke is jew lie spreading POS in my opinion.
Abrahamic religions (also Abrahamism) are the monotheistic faiths emphasizing and tracing their common origin to Abraham[1] or recognizing a spiritual tradition identified with him.[2][3][4] They are one of the three major divisions in comparative religion, along with Indian religions (Dharmic) and East Asian religions (Taoic). As of the early twenty-first century[update], it was estimated that 54% of the world’s population (3.8 billion people) considered themselves adherents of the Abrahamic religions, about 30% of other religions, and 16% of no religion.[5][6]
The three major Abrahamic religions are, in chronological order of founding, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Judaism regards itself as the religion of the descendants of Jacob,[n 1] a grandson of Abraham. It has a strictly unitary view of God, and the central holy book for almost all branches is the Hebrew Bible as elucidated in the oral Torah.
Christianity began as a sect of Judaism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religions
I think i’ll give forums a miss lol .. afterall whichever forum you go to there is always the ‘few’ that have it all worked out and ‘hog’ the show, thank God for them lol .. peace to you all . I’ll just pop in now and then to get the updates from ZCF to improve my history.
@ londontruthseeker
May 29, 2012 at 12:39 pm
Stay my friend and show the robot that he is only some kind of falsely
programmed twad. Don`t fear twits and don`fear twats!
John Kaminski still alive !!!
http://grizzom.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/truth-hertz-with-charles-giuliani_29.html
http://oraclebroadcasting.com/archives.php?stream=/Truth_Hertz/Truth_Hertz.2012-05-29_16k.mp3
An excellent interview and thanks for all you do!
Hi,
You guys that refer to Christianity as Judaism have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. No idea.
For one thing, you cite professed Christians words as necessarily true words about Christianity. To be consistent, then, cite Alex Jones and his stance on the Jews. After all, he is a professed truther. Here is an example of the intellectual sloth that purports to have a clue as to what you are talking about.
If you are rationally consistent, a citation of a professed Christian needs to be as true as a citation of Jones for truthdom.
Now, just one example.
Destroyer wrote:
Matthew 10:34-39
Christ Brings Division
34 “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword.
OK. Is this really the substance of your scholarship. ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
Hebrews 4 says the word of God is a sword and it reveals hearts. James speaks of the natural man who looks into the law and looks away while the spiritual man keeps looking and instead turns away from the sin that is revealed. Christ refers to Himself as the word. In reference to a literal sword, when Peter wielded one, Christ told him not to and said that he who lives by the sword would die by the sword.
I could probably cite 20 texts that would corroborate the principle that holiness reveals the heart and there are two general responses. One is to turn away from the unrighteousness that is revealed, the other is to turn away from the holiness that reveals.
The division Christ refers to is in the realm of morality. Those who seek to be good will be enemies of those who do not.
I find it ironic, then, that in terms of morality, perhaps the chief attribute of the Jews and their God is “Destroyer.”
Hmmmmm.
I repeat, Destroyer and others, when it comes to the Bible, your understanding is zero. You have none.
None.
Regards,
Tony
Luke 12:51-53
51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:
52 For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three.
53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
Hey D, I sometimes wonder if the jewish books are sprinkled with magic mushrooms. LOL amanita muscaria
Tony, have to disagree. Their ant-Jesus stance is real Jewy and very predictable.
I think there may be two of them and I think you are describing
the direction pretty accurately…
Jesus Christ, if historical, was a Jewish revolutionary apocalyptic preacher who hated the Romans and prayed that Yahweh would wipe them out and usher in the Jewish Messianic Age.
You claim to be anti-Jewish and yet you worship this “Joshua Messiah” as your god. You’re schizophrenic.
JESUS THROUGH JEWISH EYES: A RABBI EXAMINES THE LIFE AND TEACHINGS OF JESUS
http://www.menorahministries.com/Scriptorium/JesusThruJewishEyes.htm
By Rabbi John Fischer, Ph.D., Th.D.
That’s a source I’m hot to read. Not too Jewy, that one, I’m sure.
The rabbi uses nothing but the New Testament as a source to demonstrate Jesus’ Jewishness, since the New Testament is the only source we have for Jesus’ life.
I’m not sure what your argument is. More idiocy, I presume.
I don’t know why you would have a problem with Jewish sources. 80% of your holy book was written by Jews. So now all of a sudden you have a problem with a Jewish source? That makes no sense at all.
I think you’re very confused. You appear to be experiencing cognitive dissonance, as all “anti-Semitic” Christians inevitably do.
Cognitive dissonance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance
Been reading Jewish and Jewified sources my whole life. That was the problem.
I haven’t taken a stand on the NT or Jesus except to say that attacking them is real, real, JEWY.
I do believe the Protocols are genuine. I do believe the Talmud is genuine.
I do think you are either completely stuffed full of Jew disinfo on this topic or a lying Jew.
Well guess what. You’re still reading Jewish and Jewified sources. They’re called the Old and New Testaments.
According to the Rebbe. LOL!
I remember the eternal ad in the classifieds of The Nation magazine pushing the same Jew lie.
Destroyer,
Your last reply is meant to be a refutation of what I wrote?
It’s not.
Not a refutation, Tony. I was hoping you could tell us what jewsus was really saying because my understanding of the jew book is inferior to yours, please illuminate me, I beg of you.
Feel free to catch my off-line, David. I give ZCF permission to send you my email if you would like.
I already told you what Jesus said.
Sword is a metaphor for a kind of revelation that exposes character. This is a revelation of holiness. People respond in either one of two general ways. One is to allow greater revelations of holiness and the other to turn away.
This is how the sword produces division. The 2 different categories of people will be at odds with each other.
Do you know that the Bible has foretold future events? As one example, it clearly foretells the emergence of the papacy, which emerges at the destruction of 3 tribes which, not coincidentally, were non-trinitarian Sabbath-keeping. Through the use of Scripture, a man named Josiah Litch predicted the demise of the Ottoman Empire TO THE VERY DAY (I think ~4 years before the event). The Bible predicted Alexander the Great. It also predicted three amazing cosmic events in succession – falling stars, the dark day, and the moon appearing as blood. You can read about it.
It is simply impossible for the Bible to be solely a construction of a bunch of psychopathic Jews. They can’t tell the future, for example.
The word Jew has two diametrically opposed meanings. One is this insane evil people, the other the people who enter into “the Presence behind the veil.” In other words, they experience complete enlightening.
God veiled the one people (those who will be so enlightened) through the other (the satanic psychos). Look at metaphors like Mount Zion (Heb 12) or seeking God’s face or birth pangs.
There are two Jews, two Gods in the Bible. The support for this is vast.
Romans 2:28-29
28 For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh; 29 but he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the Spirit, not in the letter; whose praise is not from men but from God.
Tony
You’re a lunatic. The Jewish holy book doesn’t predict anything. When it does try to make predictions about events in the future, it fails miserably. The only “predictions” that the Jewish holy book gets correct are events that already occurred when the “predictions” were made. In fact, this is the primary method that scholars use to date Jewish prophetic writings such as are contained in the Tanakh and New Testament.
Correction: David
should be:
Destroyer
Z.O.G.
Daniel predicts four consecutive empires and names the first three – Babylon, Media-Persia, and Greece. Clearly, the 4th is Rome. The little horn power is the papacy. It emerges from within the Roman empire sometime after the empire’s emergence. It is also the fist time the text describes a power in religious rather than secular terms.
The fulfillment is braindead obvious.
As to your statement that I am an idiot, your ad hominem logical fallacy is noted and it is noted that this is all the substance your post consists of – meaning it consists of nothing of substance.
Tony
John 10:30 I and my Father are one.
Deuteronomy 13
King James Version (KJV)
13 If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder,
2 And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them;
3 Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the Lord your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul.
4 Ye shall walk after the Lord your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.
5 And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn you away from the Lord your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, and redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to thrust thee out of the way which the Lord thy God commanded thee to walk in. So shalt thou put the evil away from the midst of thee.
6 If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers;
7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth;
8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:
9 But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
10 And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the Lord thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.
11 And all Israel shall hear, and fear, and shall do no more any such wickedness as this is among you.
12 If thou shalt hear say in one of thy cities, which the Lord thy God hath given thee to dwell there, saying,
13 Certain men, the children of Belial, are gone out from among you, and have withdrawn the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which ye have not known;
14 Then shalt thou enquire, and make search, and ask diligently; and, behold, if it be truth, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought among you;
15 Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword.
16 And thou shalt gather all the spoil of it into the midst of the street thereof, and shalt burn with fire the city, and all the spoil thereof every whit, for the Lord thy God: and it shall be an heap for ever; it shall not be built again.
17 And there shall cleave nought of the cursed thing to thine hand: that the Lord may turn from the fierceness of his anger, and shew thee mercy, and have compassion upon thee, and multiply thee, as he hath sworn unto thy fathers;
18 When thou shalt hearken to the voice of the Lord thy God, to keep all his commandments which I command thee this day, to do that which is right in the eyes of the Lord thy God.
The book of Daniel was written in the second century B.C.E., although it purports to be written many centuries earlier.
Please learn some basic scholarly facts before you spout nonsense.
ZOG,
I was going to make note of what you wrote with respect to Daniel’s “prediction” of Alexander the Great.
However, this later purported date for the authorship of Daniel well precedes its prediction of the emergence of the papacy.
It is nonsensical for you to reason that Daniel is wholly dismissed by alleging a later date for its authorship that precedes a prophetic feature of it by centuries.
Wouldn’t you agree?
Tony
The book of Daniel does not predict “the papacy”. That’s utter nonsense.
Scholars date ancient Jewish “prophetic” genre literature such as the book of Daniel by noting which specific historical events are “predicted” and then using the dates of those events as a lower bounds for the dating of the writing of the particular book. If an actual historical event is mentioned in a Jewish “prophetic” book, that means the event has already occurred when the author was writing, and thus the date of that historical event can be used to fairly accurately date the writing of the book.
Were you aware of that?
This is how bible scholars date the NT gospel of Mark, for example. The destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple is mentioned in Mark(as a “prediction”), therefore the book of Mark must have been written sometime after the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in the first Jewish revolt against Rome in 70 C.E. So bible scholars commonly date the writing of the book of Mark to sometime after 70 C.E.
Of course, the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple mentioned in the book of Mark could also easily be referring to the second destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple during the second Jewish revolt against Rome, the Bar Kochba Revolt, in 135 C.E. This would mean the book of Mark is a mid 2nd century work.
Jews love to see you using CE
Yes, Tony, I hate to have to tell you this, but Jews do not have some kind of magical “psychic” ability to predict the future.
Sorry to burst your bubble.
Logic ZOG Style
“Joe Blow could not have killed John Doe in 1989 because we just found out he did not die in 2005. He died in 1995.”
“Please learn some basic scholarly facts before you spout nonsense.”
Gotta love the razor-sharp intellectual acumen.
My take…
Jesus nailed the spawn of Satan, not as they thought the other way around.
Most or all of the OT and some of the NT is garbage. The OT in particular is a post-Christian plagarisation of Egyptian myth and history – essentially a fraudulent back-story to ‘Judaify’ Christ.
To attack Christ is to do the work of the Jews for them
“When Ron Paul was a voice in the wilderness, warning against the consequences of our aggressive foreign policy, we gave him a regular platform and promoted his views. That the rest of the country – and the world – has since discovered him is a wonderful development, one that will have a major impact on the American political landscape in years to come. While we don’t take credit for that, either, it’s hardly an overstatement to say the early exposure he got on this site – which introduced him to a wider audience – helped create the mass movement he leads today.
So, while nothing’s changed, as far as American foreign policy is concerned, the movement against that policy has grown by leaps and bounds – and that is in large part due to the success of this web site.
Yet there is a danger that the gains of the past decade or so will be lost – because we are up against a financial crisis that could well be our undoing.
We are about $20,000 short of making our fundraising goal this quarter. If we don’t make it, we will be forced to make major cutbacks – which means, in real terms, getting rid of a good number of our employees. I’m ashamed to say we pay these workers a mere pittance, by the standards of the day – but we won’t be able to pay even that if we don’t raise $20,000 in the next few days. What this means, in effect, is that the news and commentary you’ve come to depend on will get delivered much more slowly – if it gets delivered at all. What it means is that the few people left on staff will be overwhelmed with work, fighting to keep up with the flood of news and the War Party’s latest schemes.
[b]I have, myself, been struggling to keep up: the strain of writing a substantial column, complete with extensive links, every other day has taken its toll. Add to this a fundraising campaign that seems to have no end, and a problematic medical condition I’ve kept largely quiet about, and we have all the ingredients of a major personal and professional meltdown.
At times, a vast weariness nearly overcomes me, and I just want to take to my bed, close my eyes, and forget. Yet I can’t forget the cries of the wounded, the victims of American “liberation,” the ghosts of those slaughtered in the name of our endless “war on terrorism.” They haunt me even as I sleep.[/b]
Who will speak for them if Antiwar.com ceases to exist?”
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2012/05/31/we-interrupt-this-column/
Boo-Hoo !
Every 3 months Justin Raimondo passes the hat around – every 3 months he meets his fund-raising goals. He lives near Russian River among the Jew-controlled “progressive” community in Sonoma County.
From personal experience with the Jew controllers of the Sonoma County “anti-war” movement, I can say – criticicism of war is welcome, unless it involves criticism of Israel. Then the Jew Controllers say “Shush”.
I invite the ZCF community to give Faux anti-warrior Justin Raimondo a dose of un-adulterated anti-Jew-war thought.
AbdulM, thanks for the info on Raimondo. Gave up him long ago. Too much dog crap in the mix. Alexander Cockburn lives up there somewhere (Petrolia?). His father was an apologist for the Jewish Bolshevik nightmare and sonny boy is an Israeli diaper. Still denying 9/11, JFK, and anything else which would reveal the evil Yids operations. “Progressive”! What a riot that term is! Any Goy wine up there is or is it all Manischewitz?
Crazy Christian Mother Attacks Son for Being an Atheist.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhiX_rAgimY
Luke 12:51-53
51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:
52 For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three.
53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
“The book of Daniel does not predict “the papacy”. That’s utter nonsense.”
It absolutely does. It is brain dead obvious.
Hi, the “nazi” term it is NOT an acronym of nationalsozialistischen…
…The term “Nazi” (along with “Nazism”) is a political epithet invented by Konrad Heiden (7 August 1901 – 18 June 1966) during the 1920s as a means of denigrating the NSDAP and National Socialism.
It would be like saying “nutsy”. So, if for no other reason, one should easily understand why the term was regarded as derogatory by the National Socialists and why they would NEVER use it to describe themselves.
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/exposing-the-nazi-epithet-who-started-it-why-how-and-who-benefits/