The Truth About the Third Reich

3 Responses to The Truth About the Third Reich

1. Heydrich says:

   March 2, 2012 at 2:59 am

   ZCF, this not germane to the item above, but I want you to please keep this in mind when someone spouts nonsense that “Jews financed Hitler.”

   I have many ways to dispel this, but here is the simplest…

   Jews did not finance the Nazis. The Nazis financed themselves.

   Today’s masses cannot imagine a world in which bankers are not gods, served by all of mankind. It’s all the masses have ever known.

   But what if a national leader gains control over the banks? Such a leader would have no need for bankers’ bribes. On the contrary, bankers would come to HIM for loans. A leader with no need for bribes is free to serve the people.

   And so, why would Hitler need Jewish financing, when Hitler had control of the financing?

   I can hear the clowns come back and say, “Well, ah, Hitler needed international financing, and so he served Jews.”

   This again is a product of people who simply cannot imagine a world in which bankers are not gods.

   The Nazis sometimes used gold in their international relations when they needed to make a deal quickly and easily, but they usually established barter agreements. “You send us raw materials, and our factories will make them into goods, which we will send back to you. Everybody makes out. Everyone has a job.”

   Thus the Nazis had no need for outside Jewish financing. They financed themselves.

   Did you know that the Nazis actually privatized the Dresdner Bank, and then the Reichsbank? How can this be? Doesn’t it run contrary to National Socialism?
   No.

   Let me pose a question. Which is better, a privately owned central bank, or a publicly owned central bank? Answer: it depends on the government.

   If a nation has a strong and benevolent leader like Hitler, then a private bank is better, since it keeps monetary policy separate from politics. Hitler privatized the Reichsbank, but he retained final authority over it, while allowing the bankers to serve as bean counters.

   Put another way, Hitler let the Reichsbank handle monetary policy (i.e. where the money came from and how the money supply was regulated) while Hitler had authority over fiscal policy (where money and resources were spent and invested).

   But what happens when bankers take total power? In that case, privately owned banks become the supreme evil in the world. Everyone in the nation becomes a slave of the bankers, including politicians. This is the situation in most countries today.

   (One reason why Libya was destroyed was that Libya had a public central bank. Syria also has a pubic central bank, so it too must be destroyed. Worse, the Baath Party is essentially National Socialist, as is Syria’s second biggest party, which calls itself the Social Nationalists. They just took the Nazi’s name and reversed it.)

   Is debt evil? Again, it depends on the government. The Nazis could have given everyone a house for free, but they chose to issue 10-year mortgages at a flat 4 percent interest – and they erased a quarter of the mortgage for every child a family had. Thus, the mortgage was an incentive for families to have kids.

   And when you take out a mortgage and build equity, you take pride in the property. You maintain it. People tend not to value things they get for free. That’s why the Nazis didn’t hand out Volkswagens for free. People had to save up coupons to earn a Volkswagen. When the coupon book was full, they had a car, plus the pride of knowing that, “I EARNED this!” When you earn something, you invest yourself in it. The item becomes your “child.” (Unfortunately the war broke out before everyone could get his car.)

   But if the Nazis erased mortgages, didn’t the government lose money? No, because for every child a family had, that family had to spend more on consumer goods (food, medicine, diapers, toys, clothes, etc.) This helped jump-start the consumer economy.

   In Nazi Germany, money and bankers served the masses, not the other way around. Hence Germans were free to become humans once more. They were free to dream, and they achieved fantastic advances in technology.

   If someone wanted to make a profit and get rich, this was permissable, so long as he did not get rich by trickery, or by stealing from the masses.

   National Socialism was a Third Way. As such, it was pure capitalism and pure communism – yet transcended both. “Pure capitalism” means it was not finance capitalism. Money was invested in goods, services, R & D, and human resources. This differs from the Jewish practice of making-money-from-money, which was outlawed. There was no place for moneychangers, Jewish or otherwise.

   Of course, capitalism and communism are two sides of the same coin. Capitalism means rule by the rich. Communism means rule by the bureaucracy. Each side fears and despises a Third Way that incorporates both, yet transcends both. Hence both communists and capitalists ganged up against national socialists.

   What about speculation in stocks and commodities? Is this evil? Once again, it depends on the government. The Nazis maintained stock and commodities markets for two reasons. First, it encouraged excellence. Investors tend to buy stock in superior companies. Second, it let the Nazis manipulate industry for the National Socialist cause. By promoting key companies and industries, the Nazis encouraged investors to put their money into those key items, thus boosting those items while serving the masses.

   But wait. Stock and commodities markets? Doesn’t that take us back to the realm of Jews? No – not if investors must absorb their own losses from bad bets, and not if investors cannot manipulate the markets for their own personal gain at everyone else’s expense. THAT is Jewish. THAT is cheating. THAT is evil. THAT is what we have today.

   Nazi economics were so simple and so common-sensical, that a child could understand it. But we cannot discuss this because of the hoax and Jewish supremacy. And since the masses today cannot imagine a sane world, we get the “Jews financed Hitler” crap. The masses are so inured to corruption that they simply cannot grasp that a national leader could love the people more than he loved himself. And so the masses made war on Hitler, just as they crucified Jesus.

   I agree with the Chilean diplomat, explorer, and author Miguel Serrano, who considered Hitler to be the “Last Avatar” – i.e. the last true Agent of the Light. Serrano meant this literally, not figuratively.

   One other thing: most people today mistakenly think that personal finance is the same as state or government finance. They are not the same. An individual can run out of money, but a nation with monetary sovereignty cannot, since it can just print more money (or issue more credit). The only constraint is inflation if too much money is issued too quickly. People who do not understand this think, “Well, the Nazis got money from SOMEWHERE, so it had to be Jews.”

   No! The Nazis issued their own money and credit. What need did they have for Jews?

   And where do Jewish bankers get their money anyway? They conjure it out of thin air, and lend it at interest, using debt to enslave the planet. The Nazis refused submit to this sick game. Thus they had to be destroyed.

   I could go on and on about Nazi economics, but I’ll cut it off here.

   Just remember, Jews did not finance the Nazis. The Nazis financed themselves.

   Reply
   • ZionCrimeFactory says:

     March 2, 2012 at 3:28 am

     Very, very good Heydrich.

     Reply
2. European says:

   March 2, 2012 at 4:48 am

   Video stops in about an half for me.

   Reply